Trial reportEBioMedicine2020
Blood biomarkers on admission in acute traumatic brain injury: Relations to severity, CT findings and care path in the CENTER-TBI study.
Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 161 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
MATRIx: MesenchymAl Stromal Cells for Traumatic bRain Injury
Investigating the Significance of Protein Biomarkers During the Hyperacute Phase of Traumatic Brain Injury and Other CNS Conditions With Hypoxia/Hypoperfusion in Emergency and Prehospital Settings (CHARON)
Who cites it
161 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 274 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploiting blood-based biomarkers to align preclinical models with human traumatic brain injury.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 in predicting brain abnormalities on CT scans after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Pooled it
- Applications of machine learning in pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI): a systematic review of the literature.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Appropriate incorporation of susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging into routine imaging protocols for accurate diagnosis of traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Pooled it
- The association between inflammatory markers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Blood biomarkers of secondary outcomes following concussion: A systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- S100B, GFAP, UCH-L1 and NSE as predictors of abnormalities on CT imaging following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- GFAP and S100B: What You Always Wanted to Know and Never Dared to Ask.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Coordinating Global Multi-Site Studies of Military-Relevant Traumatic Brain Injury: Opportunities, Challenges, and Harmonization Guidelines.Brain imaging and behavior · 2021Pooled it
- Serum neurofilament light chain levels at attack predict post-attack disability worsening and are mitigated by inebilizumab: analysis of four potential biomarkers in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2023Trial
- Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: A Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Biomarker.Annals of neurology · 2021Trial
- Does acute soccer heading cause an increase in plasma S100B? A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Clinical Effectiveness of a Blood-Based Biomarker in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Whole-blood point of care biomarker testing following traumatic brain injury.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Evaluation of ChatGPT-5 for CT Imaging in Canadian CT Head Rule-Positive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Association of lifesaving versus non-lifesaving extracranial surgery with long-term outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective CENTER-TBI cohort analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Observational
- Blood-based biomarkers GFAP/UCH-L1 for the diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): a single-center implementation experience.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Observational
- Proteomic blood-based biomarkers of brain damage in traumatic brain injury: are they suitable surrogate endpoints for cerebral pressure autoregulatory-guided therapy?Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Targeting Peptidylarginine Deiminases in Neurons and Astrocytes in Central Nervous System Injury-Effects of Pan-PAD Inhibitor Cl-Amidine in an Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation Model of Ischaemia (OGD/R) and LPS Stimulation In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSerum biomarkers may inform and improve care in traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aimed to correlate serum biomarkers with clinical severity, care path and imaging abnormalities in TBI, and explore their incremental value over clinical characteristics in predicting computed tomographic (CT) abnormalities.
methodsWe analyzed six serum biomarkers (S100B, NSE, GFAP, UCH-L1, NFL and t-tau) obtained <24 h post-injury from 2867 patients with any severity of TBI in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research (CENTER-TBI) Core Study, a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals.
findingsAll biomarkers scaled with clinical severity and care path (ER only, ward admission, or ICU), and with presence of CT abnormalities. GFAP achieved the highest discrimination for predicting CT abnormalities (AUC 0•89 [95%CI: 0•87-0•90]), with a 99% likelihood of better discriminating CT-positive patients than clinical characteristics used in contemporary decision rules. In patients with mild TBI, GFAP also showed incremental diagnostic value: discrimination increased from 0•84 [95%CI: 0•83-0•86] to 0•89 [95%CI: 0•87-0•90] when GFAP was included. Results were consistent across strata, and injury severity. Combinations of biomarkers did not improve discrimination compared to GFAP alone.
interpretationCurrently available biomarkers reflect injury severity, and serum GFAP, measured within 24 h after injury, outperforms clinical characteristics in predicting CT abnormalities. Our results support the further development of serum GFAP assays towards implementation in clinical practice, for which robust clinical assay platforms are required.
fundingCENTER-TBI study was supported by the European Union 7th Framework program (EC grant 602150).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.