Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32464484›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience letters2020

Genetic underpinnings of cerebral edema in acute brain injury: an opportunity for pathway discovery.

Elayna Kirsch, Natalia Szejko, Guido J Falcone

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. On Net Water Uptake in Posttraumatic Ischemia Foci.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  6. A Focal Impact Model of Traumatic Brain Injury inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Imaging biomarkers of cerebral edema automatically extracted from routine CT scans of large vessel occlusion strokes.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elayna KirschDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Neurocritical Care & Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, 15 York Street, LLCI Room 1004D, P.O. Box 20801, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Natalia SzejkoDivision of Neurocritical Care & Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, 15 York Street, LLCI Room 1004D, P.O. Box 20801, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Bioethics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Guido J FalconeDivision of Neurocritical Care & Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, 15 York Street, LLCI Room 1004D, P.O. Box 20801, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. Electronic address: guido.falcone@yale.edu.
Duke University · USMedical University of Warsaw · PLYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Deep Intracerebral HemorrhageR03NS112859 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FALCONE, GUIDO JOSE, SHETH, KEVIN NAVIN · 2019 to 2020
$84k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059992NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS112859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral edema constitutes an important contributor to secondary injury in acute brain injury. The quantification of cerebral edema in neuroimaging, a well-established biomarker of secondary brain injury, represents a useful intermediate phenotype to study edema formation. Population genetics provides powerful tools to identify novel susceptibility genes, biological pathways and therapeutic targets related to brain edema formation. Here, we provide an overview of the pathogenesis of cerebral edema, introduce relevant genetic methods to study this process, and discuss the ongoing research on the genetic underpinnings of edema formation in acute brain injury. The epsilon 2 and 4 variants within the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene are associated with worse outcome after traumatic brain injury and intracerebral hemorrhage, and recent studies link these polymorphisms to inflammatory processes that lead to blood-brain barrier disruption and vasogenic edema. For the Haptoglobin gene (HP), the Hp 2-2 genotype associates with worse outcome after acute brain injury, whereas the haptoglobin Hp 1-1 genotype correlates with increased edema in the early phases of intracerebral hemorrhage. Another important protein in cerebral edema is aquaporin 4, coded by the AQP4 gene. AQP4 mutations contribute to the formation of cytotoxic edema, and further genetic research is necessary to help elucidate the mediating mechanism. Findings supporting the target genes outlined above require replication in larger samples and evaluation in non-white populations. These next steps will be significantly facilitated by the rapid changes observed in the field of population genetics, including large international collaborations, open access to genetic data, and significant reductions in the cost of genotyping technologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAquaporin 4Brain EdemaBrain InjuriesBrain IschemiaHumansNeuroimagingStrokeAquaporin 4Brain edemaHemorrhagic strokeIntracerebral hemorrhageIschemic strokeStrokeStroke geneticsTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32464484
PMCPMC7372633
OpenAlexW3032808949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.