ArticleJournal of clinical epidemiology2020
"One more time": why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant to COVID-19 makes sense.
Article in Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic reviews of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 continue to be poorly conducted and reported: a systematic review.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Pooled it
- Methodological assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on COVID-19: A meta-epidemiological study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2021Pooled it
- Exploring duplication in reviews of Long COVID: 2020-2023.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Extent and nature of duplication in PROSPERO using COVID-19-related registrations: a retrospective investigation and survey.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence.Systematic reviews · 2021Article
- "NEVER LET A CRISIS GO TO WASTE": HOW SCIENCE HAS RESPONDED TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2021Article
- The mass production of systematic reviews about COVID-19: An analysis of PROSPERO records.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2021Article
- Assessment of Duplicate Evidence in Systematic Reviews of Imaging Findings of Children With COVID-19.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Developing Guidelines Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.Annals of internal medicine · 2020Article
- Rapid review methods more challenging during COVID-19: commentary with a focus on 8 knowledge synthesis steps.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2020Review
- Rapid Scoping Review of Laparoscopic Surgery Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Appraisal Using a Simple Quality Appraisal Tool "EMERGE".The Indian journal of surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.