Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32464137›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2020

The effects of novelty on food consumption in male and female rats.

Eliza M Greiner, Gorica D Petrovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of Prenatal Nicotine, THC, or Co-Exposure on Cognitive Behaviors in Adolescent Male and Female Rats.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eliza M GreinerDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Gorica D PetrovichDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA. Electronic address: gorica.petrovich@bc.edu.

Funding

Forebrain Circuits and Control of Feeding Behavior by Learned CuesR01DK085721 · NIDDK · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI PETROVICH, GORICA D · 2010 to 2020
$3.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novelty powerfully impacts feeding behavior and can override homeostatic and hedonic drives, because consumption of a new food could lead to illness or even death. New foods and new feeding environments can decrease or inhibit feeding, but how the two interact and whether there are sex differences has not been determined. The current study examined consumption of a palatable (high sucrose) novel food compared to a familiar food in adult male and female rats that were fed in a familiar or a novel environment. Rats were deprived of food for 20 h prior to each of eight tests. During the first test, male and female rats that were tested in a familiar environment showed robust taste neophobia, as they mainly consumed familiar food. Across repeated tests, these rats increased consumption of the novel food, which indicated that they habituated to the novel taste and developed a preference for the novel food. In contrast, all rats tested in a novel feeding environment ate very little of both foods during the initial test. Across repeated tests, male rats habituated to the novel food faster than females and by the fourth test ate more of the novel than familiar food. In contrast, females showed sustained, suppressed consumption across habituation tests. These results demonstrated robust differences in feeding behavior depending whether rats were fed at home or in a novel feeding environment, and robust sex differences in habituation to eating in a new environment. These findings suggest that novel context has a greater impact on female consumption than male consumption. This difference may be relevant to sex differences in avoidant behaviors in maladaptive circumstances and the development of psychopathology. Therefore, the behavioral profile outlined in this study for consumption under novelty provides an important starting point for investigation of the underlying neural substrates of novelty processing.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorTasteAnimalsAvoidance LearningEatingFemaleFoodMaleRatsSex CharacteristicsContextHabitationNoveltyPalatable foodSex differencesTaste neophobia

Identifiers

PMID32464137
PMCPMC7358116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.