Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32464079›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020

Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Uzma Shaheen Wilson, Jenna Browning-Kamins, Sriram Boothalingam, Arturo Moleti, Renata Sisto, Sumitrajit Dhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Uzma Shaheen WilsonRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Jenna Browning-KaminsRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Sriram BoothalingamRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Arturo MoletiPhysics Department, University of Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Renata SistoIstituto Nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro Research, Rome, Italy.
Sumitrajit DharRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

Funding

Assessing the Human Cochlea using Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions (SFOAEs)F32DC017352 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI AKHTAR, UZMA SHAHEEN · 2018 to 2020
$240k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC017352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The phase delay of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) has been proposed as a noninvasive, objective, and fast source for estimating cochlear mechanical tuning. However, the implementation of SFOAEs clinically has been thwarted by the gaps in understanding of the stability of SFOAE delay-based tuning estimates and their relationship to behavioral measures of tuning. Therefore, the goals of this study were (a) to investigate the relationship between delay-based tuning estimates from SFOAEs and simultaneously masked psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) and (b) to assess the across- and within-session repeatability of tuning estimates from behavioral and OAE measures. Method Three sets of behavioral and OAE measurements were collected in 24 normal-hearing, young adults for two probe frequencies, 1 and 4 kHz. For each participant, delay-based tuning estimates were derived from the phase gradient of SFOAEs. SFOAE-based and behavioral estimates of tuning obtained using the fast-swept PTC paradigm were compared within and across sessions. Results In general, tuning estimates were sharper at 4 kHz compared to 1 kHz for both PTCs and SFOAEs. Statistical analyses revealed a significant correlation between SFOAE delay-based tuning and PTCs at 4 kHz, but not 1 kHz. Lastly, SFOAE delay-based tuning estimates showed better intra- and intersession repeatability compared to PTCs. Conclusions SFOAE phase-gradient delays reflect aspects of cochlear mechanical tuning, in that a frequency dependence similar to that of basilar membrane tuning was observed. Furthermore, the significant correlation with PTCs at 4 kHz and the high repeatability of SFOAE-based tuning measures offer promise of an objective, nonbehavioral assay of tuning in human ears.

Indexed as

CochleaOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousAcoustic StimulationHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32464079
PMCPMC7839027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.