ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020
p
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved Structure-Based Histidine pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Electric Fields in Polymeric Systems.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Accurately Predicting Protein pJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- A generalized Kirkwood implicit solvent for the polarizable AMOEBA protein model.The Journal of chemical physics · 2023Article
- AMOEBA Force Field Trajectories Improve Predictions of Accurate pThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Characterizing Protein Protonation Microstates Using Monte Carlo Sampling.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Implicit Solvents for the Polarizable Atomic Multipole AMOEBA Force Field.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021Article
- Recent Developments in Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic polarization effects have been suggested to play an important role in proton binding to titratable residues in proteins. In this work, we describe a new computational method for p
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.