ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2020
The demographics of assisted reproductive technology births in a Nordic country.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Offspring's School Grades by Maternal Education.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2026Article
- Association of serum uric acid during pre-pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes among women conceived by in-vitro fertilization: a retrospective cohort study.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies Based on Chorionicity: A Systematic Review of ART-Conceived Monochorionic vs. Dichorionic Twins.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Microsimulation reveals that medically assisted reproduction is unlikely to compensate for cohort fertility decline due to increasing maternal ages.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Asthma and Infertility: A Prospective Case-Control Study on Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in Women With Asthma Undergoing Assisted Reproduction.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in achieving a live birth after initiating ART treatment: a national register-based study among women in Denmark.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Risk of breast cancer in assisted reproduction technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.International journal of surgery protocols · 2025Article
- From reproductive violence to empowerment: reconquering power in assisted reproduction - a qualitative study.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Investigating Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to and Utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technology Among Infertile Couples in Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Time to birth for spontaneous and ART births among infertile groups.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- The Fertility Market in Latin America and Brazil: A Narrative Review of Trends and Key Players.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Review
- Signaling Pathways in Human Blastocyst Development: From Molecular Mechanisms to In Vitro Optimization.Journal of developmental biology · 2025Review
- Age-related changes in lncRNA expression in sperm.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Review
- Conception and Concern: A Review of Breast Cancer Risk in Assisted Reproductive Technology.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Review
- Financial cost of assisted reproductive technology for patients in high-income countries: A systematic review protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
- Alignment, Anticipation, Adaptation, or Lagging Behind? Age-Based Regulations in Assisted Reproduction and Late Fertility.Population and development review · 2024Article
- The association between preterm births and assisted reproductive technologies.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2024Article
- Educational gradients in the prevalence of medically assisted reproduction births in a comparative perspective.Fertility and sterility · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat are the socio-demographic characteristics of families in Norway who have children after assisted reproductive technology (ART), and have these characteristics changed over time? SUMMARY ANSWER: Parents who conceive through ART in Norway tend to be advantaged families, and their socio-demographic profile has not changed considerably over the period 1985-2014. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A small number of studies show that couples who conceive through ART tend to be socio-economically advantaged. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Norwegian Population Register, the Medical Birth Register and the national data bases were linked to study all live births in Norway between 1985 and 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsThe sample consisted of 1 757 768 live births. Simple bivariate analyses were performed to describe the socio-demographic characteristics of parents who conceived through ART and changes in these characteristics over the time period 1985-2014. We used linear probability models to estimate the association between parental income and giving birth after ART from 2000 to 2014, before and after adjustment for maternal age at delivery, education and area of residence. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Parents conceiving through ART were more likely to be older, with the highest levels of income and education, and married. Their socio-demographic profiles did not change considerably during the period 1985-2014. In the unadjusted model, parents belonging to the top income quartile were 4.2 percentage points more likely (95% CI: 4.1 to 4.3) to have conceived through ART than parents who belonged to the bottom income quartile. Adjustment for maternal age only partially reduced the income disparities (for the top income quartile by 35% (β = 2.7 with 95% CI: 2.5 to 2.8)). Additional adjustment for maternal education, marital status and area of residence did not further attenuate the associations. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The data does not enable us to tell whether the lower numbers of children conceived through ART amongst more disadvantaged individuals is caused by lower success rates with ART treatment, lower demand of ART services or barriers faced in access to ART. The study focuses on Norway, a context characterised by high subsidisation of ART services. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsEven though in Norway access to ART services is highly subsidised, the results highlight important and persisting social inequities in use of ART. The results also indicate that children born after ART grow up in resourceful environments, which will benefit their development and well-being. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by European Research Council agreement n. 803959 (to A.G.), by Economic and Social Research Council grant ES/M001660/1 and by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project number 262700. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.