Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32463869›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2020

Leaf chemical defences and insect herbivory in oak: accounting for canopy position unravels marked genetic relatedness effects.

Elena Valdés-Correcher, Audrey Bourdin, Santiago C González-Martínez, Xoaquín Moreira, Andrea Galmán, Bastien Castagneyrol, Arndt Hampe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena Valdés-CorrecherINRAE, Univ. Bordeaux, BIOGECO, Cestas, France.
Audrey BourdinINRAE, Univ. Bordeaux, BIOGECO, Cestas, France.
Santiago C González-MartínezINRAE, Univ. Bordeaux, BIOGECO, Cestas, France.
Xoaquín MoreiraMisión Biológica de Galicia (MBG-CSIC), Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain.
Andrea GalmánMisión Biológica de Galicia (MBG-CSIC), Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain.
Bastien CastagneyrolINRAE, Univ. Bordeaux, BIOGECO, Cestas, France.
Arndt HampeINRAE, Univ. Bordeaux, BIOGECO, Cestas, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsHighly controlled experiments document that plant genetic diversity and relatedness can shape herbivore communities and patterns of herbivory. Evidence from the field is, however, scarce and inconsistent. We assessed whether a genetic signal underlying herbivory can be detected in oak woodlands when accounting for variation at smaller (within-tree) and larger (among-stand) scales.

methodsWe tested relationships between tree genetic relatedness, leaf chemical defences and insect herbivory for different canopy layers in 240 trees from 15 pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) forest stands. We partitioned sources of variability in herbivory and defences among stands, individuals and branches. KEY

resultsLeaf defences, insect herbivory and their relationship differed systematically between the upper and the lower tree canopy. When accounting for this canopy effect, the variation explained by tree genetic relatedness rose from 2.8 to 34.1 % for herbivory and from 7.1 to 13.8 % for leaf defences. The effect was driven by markedly stronger relationships in the upper canopy.

conclusionsOur findings illustrate that considerable effects of the host plant genotype on levels of leaf chemical defences and associated insect herbivory can be detected in natural tree populations when within-individual variation is properly accounted for.

Indexed as

HerbivoryQuercusAnimalsInsectaPlant LeavesTreeschemical defencesGenetic relatednessherbivoryplant–insect interactionsQuercus robur

Identifiers

PMID32463869
PMCPMC7539359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.