Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32463531›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2020

Anthropogenic threats to evolutionary heritage of angiosperms in the Netherlands through an increase in high-competition environments.

Igor V Bartish, Wim A Ozinga, Mark I Bartish, G W Wieger Wamelink, Stephan M Hennekens, Benjamin Yguel, Andreas Prinzing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Igor V BartishDepartment of Genetic Ecology, Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic, Zamek 1, Průhonice, 25243, Czech Republic.
Wim A OzingaWageningen Environmental Research (Alterra), P.O. Box 47, Wageningen, NL-6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Mark I BartishRoyal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SE-100 44, Sweden.
G W Wieger WamelinkWageningen Environmental Research (Alterra), P.O. Box 47, Wageningen, NL-6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Stephan M HennekensWageningen Environmental Research (Alterra), P.O. Box 47, Wageningen, NL-6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Benjamin YguelCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO-UMR 7204), Sorbonne Universités-MNHN-CNRS-UPMC, CP51, 55-61 rue Buffon, Paris, 75005, France.
Andreas PrinzingUniversity Rennes 1, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Research Unit "Ecosystèmes, Biodiversité, Evolution", Evolution (UMR 6553), Campus Beaulieu, Bâtiment 14 A, Rennes, 35042, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Present biodiversity comprises the evolutionary heritage of Earth's epochs. Lineages from particular epochs are often found in particular habitats, but whether current habitat decline threatens the heritage from particular epochs is unknown. We hypothesized that within a given region, humans threaten specifically habitats that harbor lineages from a particular geological epoch. We expect so because humans threaten environments that dominated and lineages that diversified during these epochs. We devised a new approach to quantify, per habitat type, diversification of lineages from different epochs. For Netherlands, one of the floristically and ecologically best-studied regions, we quantified the decline of habitat types and species in the past century. We defined habitat types based on vegetation classification and used existing ranking of decline of vegetation classes and species. Currently, most declining habitat types and the group of red-listed species are characterized by increased diversification of lineages dating back to Paleogene, specifically to Paleocene-Eocene and Oligocene. Among vulnerable habitat types with large representation of lineages from these epochs were sublittoral and eulittoral zones of temperate seas and 2 types of nutrient-poor, open habitats. These losses of evolutionary heritage would go unnoticed with classical measures of evolutionary diversity. Loss of heritage from Paleocene-Eocene became unrelated to decline once low competition, shade tolerance, and low proportion of non-Apiaceae were accounted for, suggesting that these variables explain the loss of heritage from Paleocene-Eocene. Losses of heritage from Oligocene were partly explained by decline of habitat types occupied by weak competitors and shade-tolerant species. Our results suggest a so-far unappreciated human threat to evolutionary heritage: habitat decline threatens descendants from particular epochs. If the trends persist into the future uncontrolled, there may be no habitats within the region for many descendants of evolutionary ancient epochs, such as Paleogene.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaBiodiversityBiological EvolutionConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansNetherlandsPhylogenyabiotic and biotic constraintsbiodiversity conservationconservación de la biodiversidaddeclinación de los tipos de hábitatdecline of habitat typesdiversificación filogenética específica de la épocaepoch-specific phylogenetic diversificationinferencia paleoecológicalimitaciones bióticas y abióticaspaleoecological inferencePaleogenePaleógeno古生态推断古第三纪地质时期特异的系统发育多样化生境类型减少生物多样性保护非生物与生物制约

Identifiers

PMID32463531
PMCPMC7754312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.