Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32463470›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2020

Bupropion for the Treatment of Apathy in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Franziska Maier, Annika Spottke, Jan-Philipp Bach, Claudia Bartels, Katharina Buerger, Richard Dodel, Andreas Fellgiebel, Klaus Fliessbach, Lutz Frölich, Lucrezia Hausner and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating the Use of Anxiety Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Dementia Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Medications for apathy in dementia.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Modeling Path Importance for Effective Alzheimer's Disease Drug Repurposing.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2024
    Article
  11. An Update on Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Error in Affiliations.JAMA network open · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Franziska MaierDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany.
Annika SpottkeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.
Jan-Philipp BachDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Claudia BartelsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Katharina BuergerInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Richard DodelDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Andreas FellgiebelCenter for Mental Health in Old Age, Landeskrankenhaus, Mainz, Germany.
Klaus FliessbachGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.
Lutz FrölichDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Lucrezia HausnerDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Martin HellmichInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan KlöppelUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Arne KlostermannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes KornhuberDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Christoph LaskeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Tübingen, Germany.
Oliver PetersGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany.
Josef PrillerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany.
Tanja Richter-SchmidingerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Anja SchneiderGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.
Kija Shah-HosseiniInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan TeipelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Rostock, Germany.
Christine A F von ArnimDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Jens WiltfangDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Frank JessenDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEEssen University Hospital · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Apathy is a frequent neuropsychiatric symptom in dementia of Alzheimer type and negatively affects the disease course and patients' and caregivers' quality of life. Effective treatment options are needed. Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of the dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor bupropion in the treatment of apathy in patients with dementia of Alzheimer type. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted in a psychiatric and neurological outpatient setting between July 2010 and July 2014 in Germany. Patients with mild-to-moderate dementia of Alzheimer type and clinically relevant apathy were included. Patients with additional clinically relevant depressed mood were excluded. Data analyses were performed between August 2018 and August 2019. Interventions: Patients received either bupropion or placebo (150 mg for 4 weeks plus 300 mg for 8 weeks). In case of intolerability of 300 mg, patients continued to receive 150 mg throughout the study. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change on the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician Version (AES-C) (score range, 18-72 points) between baseline and week 12 was the primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters included measures of neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognition, activities of daily living, and quality of life. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Results: A total of 108 patients (mean [SD] age, 74.8 [5.9] years; 67 men [62%]) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, with 54 randomized to receive bupropion and 54 randomized to receive placebo. The baseline AES-C score was comparable between the bupropion group and the placebo group (mean [SD], 52.2 [8.7] vs 50.4 [8.2]). After controlling for the baseline AES-C score, site, and comedication with donepezil or galantamine, the mean change in the AES-C score between the bupropion and placebo groups was not statistically significant (mean change, 2.22; 95% CI, -0.47 to 4.91; P = .11). Results on secondary outcomes showed statistically significant differences between bupropion and placebo in terms of total neuropsychiatric symptoms (mean change, 5.52; 95% CI, 2.00 to 9.04; P = .003) and health-related quality of life (uncorrected for multiple comparisons; mean change, -1.66; 95% CI, -3.01 to -0.31; P = .02) with greater improvement in the placebo group. No statistically significant changes between groups were found for activities of daily living (mean change, -2.92; 95% CI, -5.89 to 0.06; P = .05) and cognition (mean change, -0.27; 95% CI, -3.26 to 2.73; P = .86). The numbers of adverse events (bupropion group, 39 patients [72.2%]; placebo group, 33 patients [61.1%]) and serious adverse events (bupropion group, 5 patients [9.3%]; placebo group, 2 patients [3.7%]) were comparable between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Although it is safe, bupropion was not superior to placebo for the treatment of apathy in patients with dementia of Alzheimer type in the absence of clinically relevant depressed mood. Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register Identifier: 2007-005352-17.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationApathyBupropionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBupropion

Identifiers

PMID32463470
PMCPMC7256670
OpenAlexW3032608964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.