Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32463394›Full record

Observational studyRadiology and oncology2020

Care of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer stage III - the Central European real-world experience.

Milada Zemanova, Robert Pirker, Lubos Petruzelka, Zuzana Zbozínkova, Dragana Jovanovic, Mirjana Rajer, Krisztina Bogos, Gunta Purkalne, Vesna Ceriman, Subhash Chaudhary and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Radiology and oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New developments in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Milada Zemanova1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University in Prague, Prague Czech Republic.
Robert PirkerDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lubos Petruzelka1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University in Prague, Prague Czech Republic.
Zuzana ZbozínkovaInstitute of Biostatistic and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Dragana JovanovicClinic for Pulmonology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Mirjana RajerInstitute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Krisztina BogosNational Koranyi Institute of TB and Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Gunta PurkalnePauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Vesna CerimanClinic for Pulmonology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Subhash ChaudharyComprehensive Oncology Center, Nový Jičín, Liberec Czech Republic.
Igor RichterComprehensive Oncology Center, Liberec, Czech Republic.
Jirí KufaClinic for Pneumology & Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Lenka JakubikovaClinic for Pneumology & Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marius ZemaitisHospital of LUHS Kauno Klinikos, Kauno, Lithuania.
Marketa CernovskaThomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Leona KoubkovaDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zdenka VilasovaComprehensive Oncology Center and Multiscan, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Karin DieckmannDepartment of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Attila FarkasDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Jelena SpasicInstitute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Katerina FröhlichInstitute of Biostatistic and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Andreas TiefenbacherDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Virag HollosiNational Koranyi Institute of TB and Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Juraj KultanClinic for Pneumology & Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Iveta KolarováComprehensive Oncology Center and Multiscan, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Jiri Votruba1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University in Prague, Prague Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is affected by regional specificities. The present study aimed at determining diagnostic and therapeutic procedures including outcome of patients with NSCLC stage III in the real-world setting in Central European countries to define areas for improvements. Patients and methods This multicentre, prospective and non-interventional study collected data of patients with NSCLC stage III in a web-based registry and analysed them centrally. Results Between March 2014 and March 2017, patients (n=583) with the following characteristics were entered: 32% females, 7% never-smokers; ECOG performance status (PS) 0, 1, 2 and 3 in 25%, 58%, 12% and 5%, respectively; 21% prior weight loss; 53% squamous carcinoma, 38% adenocarcinoma; 10% EGFR mutations. Staging procedures included chest X-ray (97% of patients), chest CT (96%), PET-CT (27%), brain imaging (20%), bronchoscopy (89%), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) (13%) and CT-guided biopsy (9%). Stages IIIA/IIIB were diagnosed in 55%/45% of patients, respectively. N2/N3 nodes were diagnosed in 60%/23% and pathologically confirmed in 29% of patients. Most patients (56%) were treated by combined modalities. Surgery plus chemotherapy was administered to 20%, definitive chemoradiotherapy to 34%, chemotherapy only to 26%, radiotherapy only to 12% and best supportive care (BSC) to 5% of patients. Median survival and progression-free survival times were 16.8 (15.3;18.5) and 11.2 (10.2;12.2) months, respectively. Stage IIIA, female gender, no weight loss, pathological mediastinal lymph node verification, surgery and combined modality therapy were associated with longer survival. Conclusions The real-world study demonstrated a broad heterogeneity in the management o f stage III NSCLC in Central European countries and suggested to increase the rates of PET-CT imaging, brain imaging and invasive mediastinal staging.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedBrainBronchoscopyCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellCombined Modality TherapyEndosonographyEuropeFemaleGenes, erbB-1HumansImage-Guided BiopsyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle Ageddiagnostic proceduresmultimodality treatmentnon-small-cell lung cancerstage III

Identifiers

PMID32463394
PMCPMC7276648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.