Observational studyRadiology and oncology2020
Improvement of the primary efficacy of microwave ablation of malignant liver tumors by using a robotic navigation system.
Observational study in Radiology and oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Democratization in abdominal ablation therapies: The impact of percutaneous robotic assistance on accuracy-A systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Microwave ablation for hepatic malignancies: a systematic review of the technology and differences in devices.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Feasibility, safety and accuracy of a novel robotic navigation system for cone-beam CT-guided and TACE-assisted radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma, a preliminary study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted needle placement in CT-guided percutaneous ablation in the abdomen: the SaFE post-market study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Safety of a Robotic-Assisted Optical Navigation System for Pulmonary Nodule Percutaneous Cryoablation: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Arm Pilot Study.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted optical navigation system for CT-guided preoperative percutaneous Hook-wire localization of pulmonary nodules: a prospective, single-center, single-arm clinical study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Combined Single-Session Stereotactic Biopsy and Microwave Ablation of Primary and Secondary Liver Tumors.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Surgery or Percutaneous Ablation for Liver Tumors? The Key Points Are: When, Where, and How Large.Cancers · 2025Article
- Robotic navigation-assisted percutaneous liver puncture: a pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted CT-guided percutaneous pulmonary nodules localization by hook-wire needles: a retrospective observational study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Robotic Assistance in Percutaneous Liver Ablation Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation (HepACAGA) to Improve Tumor Visualization, Navigation and Margin Confirmation in Percutaneous Liver Tumor Ablation.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023Article
- Image-Guided Robotics for Standardized and Automated Biopsy and Ablation.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2021Review
- Software-based planning of ultrasound and CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in hepatic tumors.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- 3D Quantitative Ablation Margins for Prediction of Ablation Site Recurrence After Stereotactic Image-Guided Microwave Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to assess the primary efficacy of robot-assisted microwave ablation and compare it to manually guided microwave ablation for percutaneous ablation of liver malignancies. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective single center evaluation of microwave ablations of 368 liver tumors in 192 patients (36 female, 156 male, mean age 63 years). One hundred and nineteen ablations were performed between 08/2011 and 03/2014 with manual guidance, whereas 249 ablations were performed between 04/2014 and 11/2018 using robotic guidance. A 6-week follow-up (ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) was performed on all patients. Results The primary technique efficacy outcome of the group treated by robotic guidance was significantly higher than that of the manually guided group (88% vs. 76%; p = 0.013). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that a small tumor size (≤ 3 cm) and robotic guidance were significant favorable prognostic factors for complete ablation. Conclusions In addition to a small tumor size, robotic navigation was a major positive prognostic factor for primary technique efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.