Trial reportTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol
Trial report in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03034915 (A 24-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group Study to Compare Umeclidinium/Vilanterol, Umeclidinium, and Salmeterol in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 24-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group Study to Compare Umeclidinium/Vilanterol, Umeclidinium, and Salmeterol in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of umeclidinium/vilanterol dual bronchodilator therapy on pulmonary function and inflammatory responses in stable COPD patients.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Clinically Important Improvements and Disease Stability with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in the ELLITHE Trial: A Post Hoc Responder Analysis.Pulmonary therapy · 2025Article
- Future concepts in bronchodilation for COPD: dual-European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Review
- How can the findings of the EMAX trial on long-acting bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease be applied in the primary care setting?Chronic respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), both the time needed for patients to gain symptom improvement with long-acting bronchodilator therapy and whether an early response is predictive of a sustained response is unknown. This study aimed to investigate how quickly meaningful symptom responses are seen in patients with COPD with bronchodilator therapy and whether these responses are sustained.
methodsEarly MAXimisation of bronchodilation for improving COPD stability (EMAX) was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial that randomised patients to umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI), umeclidinium or salmeterol. Daily Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS:COPD) score and rescue salbutamol use were captured
resultsIn the intent-to-treat population (
conclusionPatients with symptomatic COPD had greater potential for early symptom improvements with UMEC/VI CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT03034915, 2016-002513-22 (EudraCT Number).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.