Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462768›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2020

Are the atrial natriuretic peptides a missing link predicting low-voltage areas in atrial fibrillation? Introducing the novel biomarker-based atrial fibrillation substrate prediction (ANP) score.

Timm Seewöster, Petra Büttner, Samira Zeynalova, Gerhard Hindricks, Jelena Kornej

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Atrial Cardiomyopathy: From Diagnosis to Treatment.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Role of Cardiac Natriuretic Peptides in Heart Structure and Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. NT-proANP levels in peripheral and cardiac circulation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2022
    Article
  12. Left Atrial Cardiomyopathy - A Challenging Diagnosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Timm SeewösterDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-6779
Petra BüttnerDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Samira ZeynalovaInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Gerhard HindricksDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Jelena KornejInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig Heart Institute · DEBoston University · USLeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), left atrial (LA) enlargement, and the presence of low-voltage areas (LVAs) indicate an advanced disease stage. NT-proANP is a biomarker, which is significantly higher in both phenotypes. Prediction of LVAs before catheter ablation could impact the prognosis and therapeutical management in AF patients.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to (a) analyze the predictive value of a novel biomarker-based AF substrate prediction score, and (b) compare it with DR-FLASH and APPLE scores.

methodsPatients undergoing first AF catheter ablation were included. LA volume (LAV) was analyzed prior to ablation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Blood plasma samples from the femoral vein were collected before AF ablation. NT-proANP was analyzed using commercially available assays. LVAs were determined using high-density maps during catheter ablation and defined as <0.5 mV. The novel ANP score (one point for Age ≥ 65 years, NT-proANP > 17 ng/mL, and Persistent AF) was calculated at baseline.

resultsThe study population included 156 AF patients (64 ± 10 years, 65% males, 61% persistent AF, 28% LVAs). The cut-off ANP score ≥ 2 demonstrated 77% sensitivity and 70% specificity. On logistic regression (odds ratio [OR] 3.469) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (area under the curve [AUC] 0.778, P < .001), the ANP score significantly predicted LVAs presence. There were no differences between novel ANP score - which is a new one - is described in the Abstract; with APPLE (AUC 0.718, P = .378) and DR-FLASH (AUC 0.766, P = .856) scores.

conclusionsThe novel biomarker-based ANP score demonstrates good prediction of LVAs.

Indexed as

AgedAtrial FibrillationAtrial Natriuretic FactorBiomarkersCatheter AblationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFemaleHeart AtriaHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein PrecursorsRisk FactorsAtrial Natriuretic FactorBiomarkersN-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptideProtein Precursorsatrial fibrillationatrial myopathybiomarkerselectro-anatomical substrateNT-proANPscore

Identifiers

PMID32462768
PMCPMC7368300
OpenAlexW3028800481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.