Trial reportThoracic cancer2020
Amrubicin in previously treated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: A phase II study.
Trial report in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A bibliometric analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma from 2010 to 2023.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Complexities: Exploring Mechanisms of Anthracyclineinduced Cardiotoxicity.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Review
- Immunotherapy vs. Chemotherapy in Subsequent Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Which Is Better?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Real-World Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia among Patients Treated with Single-Agent Amrubicin: Necessity of the Primary Prophylactic Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of amrubicin for previously treated malignant pleural mesothelioma.
methodsThe eligibility criteria were: previously treated unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma; performance status 0-1; age ≤ 75; adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal function. The patients were injected with 35 mg/m
resultsThe study was terminated due to delay in enrollment and 10 patients were subsequently enrolled (nine males and one female; median age 67 [range 49-73]), of which four had epithelioid tumors, three had sarcomatoid tumors and three had biphasic tumors, respectively. According to the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (IMIG), one, four, and four patients had stage II, III, and IV, respectively, and one had postoperative recurrence. There was one (10%) partial response, four (40%) had stable disease, and five (50%) patients exhibited disease progression. The overall response and disease control rates were 10% (95% CI: 0.3-44.5%) and 60% (95% CI: 26.2-87.8%), respectively. The median progression-free survival time was 1.6 months. The median overall survival time was 6.6 months, and the one-, two-, and three-year survival rates were 23%, 23%, and 0%, respectively. The observed grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia in six (60%) patients; leukopenia in five (50%) patients; and febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and pneumonia in one (10%) patient each.
conclusionsThere was not enough data to evaluate the efficacy because the study was terminated early. However, amrubicin showed limited activity and acceptable toxicities when used in previously treated malignant pleural mesothelioma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.