Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462729›Full record

ArticleBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2020

Amphicarpic plants: definition, ecology, geographic distribution, systematics, life history, evolution and use in agriculture.

Keliang Zhang, Jerry M Baskin, Carol C Baskin, Gregory P Cheplick, Xuejun Yang, Zhenying Huang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chromosome-Scale Reference Genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Keliang ZhangState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, P.R. China.
Jerry M BaskinDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.
Carol C BaskinDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.
Gregory P CheplickDepartment of Biology, City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, 10314, USA.
Xuejun YangState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, P.R. China.
Zhenying HuangState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-1309-8591
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Kentucky · USCollege of Staten Island · US

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China 31570416National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China 31800340National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China 31861143024National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China 31870711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although most plants produce all of their fruits (seeds) aboveground, amphicarpic species produce fruits (seeds) both above- and belowground. Our primary aims were to determine the number of reported amphicarpic species and their taxonomic, geographic, life form and phylogenetic distribution, to evaluate differences in the life history of plants derived from aerial and subterranean seeds, to discuss the ecological and evolutionary significance of amphicarpy, to explore the use of amphicarpic plants in agriculture, and to suggest future research directions for studies on amphicarpy. Amphicarpy occurs in at least 67 herbaceous species (31 in Fabaceae) in 39 genera and 13 families of angiosperms distributed in various geographical regions of the world and in various habitats. Seeds from aerial and subterranean fruits differ in size/mass, degree of dormancy, dispersal and ability to form a persistent seed bank, with aerial seeds generally being smaller, more dormant and more likely to be dispersed and to form a seed bank than subterranean seeds. In addition, plants produced by aerial and subterranean seeds may differ in survival and growth, competitive ability and biomass allocation to reproduction. Amphicarpic plants may exhibit a high degree of plasticity during reproduction. Subterranean fruits are usually formed earlier than aerial ones, and plants may produce only subterranean propagules under stressful environmental conditions. Differences in the life histories of plants from aerial and subterranean seeds may be an adaptive bet-hedging strategy.

Indexed as

FabaceaeSeedsAgricultureFruitPhylogenyamphicarpybet-hedgingchasmogamous and cleistogamous flowerslife historyphylogenyreproductive plasticity

Identifiers

PMID32462729
PMCPMC7540684
OpenAlexW3030773515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.