ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
The impact of airborne pollution and exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation on skin: mechanistic and physiological insight.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral Supplementation with Hydrolyzed Fish Cartilage Improves the Morphological and Structural Characteristics of the Skin: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Trial
- Impact of environmental pollution on acne: a systematic review.Skin health and disease · 2026Review
- Photoprotection of a novel resveratrol analogue: insights from 2D, 3D, and endothelialized bioprinted human skin models.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Exposome involvement in the development of acne vulgaris.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Oxidative Stress in DNA Damage and Neurodegenerative Diseases: Unveiling The Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Review
- The impact of climate change on skin cancer incidence: mechanisms, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Acne Vulgaris: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Approaches.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Review
- Algae a Potential Source in Cosmetics: Current Status, Challenges, and Economic Implications.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Review
- Lipidomic assessment of the impact of Nannochloropsis oceanica microalga lipid extract on human skin keratinocytes exposed to chronic UVB radiation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prevention of UVB Induced Metabolic Changes in Epidermal Cells by Lipid Extract from MicroalgaeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Ultraviolet Light Protection: Is It Really Enough?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For several decades air pollution has been recognized to hit drastically the skin of human body. Air pollutants predominantly accountable for aging, oxidative damage, and inflammatory allergic reactions led to psoriasis, dermatitis, acne, and skin cancer owing to the impaired functions of DNA, proteins, and lipid biomolecules. Elevated air pollution and its detrimental effects along with variations in physiological parameters of the skin are verily the scaffold for anti-pollution assertions and could be recognized as markers. The present article encompasses the salient features of air pollution and UV radiations besides dreadful effects on human skin physiological parameters and some anti-pollution approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.