Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462550›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2021

Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial.

Andrea Natale, George Monir, Anshul M Patel, Robert S Fishel, Francis E Marchlinski, M Craig Delaughter, Charles A Athill, Daniel P Melby, Mario D Gonzalez, Ramesh Hariharan and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pulsed field ablation: focused on atrial fibrillation ablation.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea NataleTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation, Austin, TX, USA. dr.natale@gmail.com.
George MonirFlorida Hospital Cardiovascular Research, Orlando, FL, USA.
Anshul M PatelEmory St Joseph's Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert S FishelFlorida Electrophysiology Associates, Atlantis, FL, USA.
Francis E MarchlinskiUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M Craig DelaughterHeartPlace, Bedford, TX, USA.
Charles A AthillSan Diego Cardiac Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
Daniel P MelbyAbbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Mario D GonzalezPenn-State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Ramesh HariharanUT Physicians - EP Heart, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
Brett GidneySanta Barbara Cottage Hospital, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Tiffany TanBiosense Webster, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
Larry A ChinitzNYU Langone Medical Center New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Abbott Northwestern Hospital · USAdventHealth Orlando · USFlorida Urology Associates · USNYU Langone Health · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USSaint Joseph's Hospital · USSan Diego Cardiac Center · USSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital · USTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity Physicians · US

Funding

Biosense Webster NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prospective, multicenter SMART SF trial demonstrated the acute safety and effectiveness of the 56-hole porous tip irrigated contact force (CF) catheter for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation with a low primary adverse event rate (2.5%), leading to FDA approval of the catheter. Here, we are reporting the long-term effectiveness and safety results that have not yet been reported.

methodsAblations were performed using the 56-hole porous tip irrigated CF catheter guided by the 3D mapping system stability module. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, and/or atrial flutter), based on electrocardiographic data at 12 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence occurring 3 months post procedure, acute procedural failures such as lack of entrance block confirmation of all PVs, and undergoing repeat procedure for atrial fibrillation in the evaluation period (91 to 365 days post the initial ablation procedure) were considered to be effectiveness failures.

resultsSeventy-eight patients (age 64.8 ± 9.7 years; male 52.6%; Caucasian 96.2%) participated in the 12-month effectiveness evaluation. Mean follow-up time was 373.5 ± 45.4 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from 12-month atrial tachyarrhythmia was 74.9%. Two procedure-related pericardial effusion events were reported at 92 and 180 days post procedure. There were no pulmonary vein stenosis complications or deaths reported through the 12-month follow-up period.

conclusionsThe SMART SF 12-month follow-up evaluation corroborates the early safety and effectiveness success previously reported for PAF ablation with STSF.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsCathetersEquipment DesignHumansMaleMiddle AgedPorosityProspective StudiesRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeContact forceEfficacyParoxysmal atrial fibrillationPorous tipRadiofrequency catheter ablationSmartTouch SF

Identifiers

PMID32462550
PMCPMC8195769
OpenAlexW3032802760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.