Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462483›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus InSurE in preterm neonates of 28 to 34 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation-a randomized controlled trial.

Bhupendra Kumar Gupta, Anindya Kumar Saha, Suchandra Mukherjee, Bijan Saha

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Higher (40%) versus lower (30%) FiOEuropean journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Comparison of efficacy between beractant and poractant alfa in respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants (28-33Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhupendra Kumar GuptaDepartment of Neonatology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research and SSKM Hospital, 244, A J C Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India.
Anindya Kumar SahaDepartment of Neonatology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research and SSKM Hospital, 244, A J C Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India.
Suchandra MukherjeeDepartment of Neonatology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research and SSKM Hospital, 244, A J C Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India.
Bijan SahaDepartment of Neonatology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research and SSKM Hospital, 244, A J C Bose Road, Kolkata, 700020, India. bijansaha18@gmail.com.
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) are commonly treated with surfactant by intubate surfactant extubate (InSurE) technique. Mode of surfactant administration has evolved towards less invasive technique in the last few years. We randomised 58 preterm infants of 28-34 weeks of gestation with RDS within 6 h of birth to receive surfactant by InSurE or minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST). Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) was used as primary respiratory support. The main objective was to compare the need of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in first 72 h of life and secondarily hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) (> grade 2), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and composite outcome of BPD/mortality. We did not find any difference in need of IMV in first 72 h between MIST and InSurE (relative risk with MIST, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 1.32). No difference was observed in terms of hs PDA, IVH (> grade 2), BPD and composite outcome of BPD/mortality.Conclusion: There is no difference between MIST and InSurE in preterm neonates with RDS with NIPPV as a primary mode of respiratory support. Larger multicentre studies are needed to further explore differences in treatment failure and other secondary outcomes.Trial registration: www.ctri.nic.in id CTRI/2019/03/017992, registration date March 8, 2019. What is Known • InSurE is commonly used for many years for treatment of RDS in preterm neonates. • MIST has been introduced as a newer tool. What is New • MIST with feeding tube is comparable with InSurE in preterm infants with RDS in developing countries. •NIPPV can be used as primary respiratory support for MIST.

Indexed as

Noninvasive VentilationCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntubation, IntratrachealMalePositive-Pressure RespirationProspective StudiesPulmonary SurfactantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornTreatment OutcomePulmonary SurfactantsInSurEMISTNeonatesNIPPVPretermRDS

Identifiers

PMID32462483
PMCPMC7251045
OpenAlexW3030210913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.