Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462419›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2020

Aberrant Telomere Length in Circulating Cell-Free DNA as Possible Blood Biomarker with High Diagnostic Performance in Endometrial Cancer.

Marco Benati, Martina Montagnana, Elisa Danese, Martina Mazzon, Elisa Paviati, Simone Garzon, Antonio Simone Laganà, Jvan Casarin, Silvia Giudici, Ricciarda Raffaelli and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco BenatiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Martina MontagnanaSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elisa DaneseSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Martina MazzonLaboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elisa PaviatiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Simone GarzonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Piazza Biroldi 1, Varese, 21100, Italy. simone.garzon@yahoo.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5840-699X
Antonio Simone LaganàDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Piazza Biroldi 1, Varese, 21100, Italy.
Jvan CasarinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Piazza Biroldi 1, Varese, 21100, Italy.
Silvia GiudiciDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ricciarda RaffaelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Fabio GhezziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Piazza Biroldi 1, Varese, 21100, Italy.
Massimo FranchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the diagnostic performance of relative telomere length (RTL) in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC). We measured RTL in cfDNA of 40 EC patients (65 ± 12 years) and 31 healthy controls (HC) (63 ± 13 years), excluding in both groups other oncologic and severe non-oncologic diseases to limit confounders. Circulating cfDNA was extracted from serum using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). After the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, telomere repeat copy number to single-gene copy number ratio was calculated. RTL in cfDNA was found to be significantly lower in EC patients than in HC (p < 0.0001). The diagnostic performance of cfDNA RTL was estimated with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, which showed a diagnostic accuracy for EC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95, p < 0.0001). The cutoff cfDNA RTL value of 2.505 (T/S copy ratio) reported a sensitivity of 80.0% (95% CI: 64.35-90.95) and a specificity of 80.65% (95% CI: 62.53-92.55). Significant differences of RTL among EC stages or grades (p = 0.85 and p = 0.89, respectively) were not observed. Our results suggest that cfDNA RTL analysis may be a diagnostic tool for EC detection since the early stage, whilst its diagnostic performance seems unsatisfactory for cancer progression, staging, and grading. However, further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. In particular, future investigations should focus on high-risk patients (such as those with atypical endometrial hyperplasia) that may benefit from this tool, because TL shortening is not specific for EC and is influenced by other oncologic and non-oncologic diseases.

Indexed as

Telomere HomeostasisAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCombined Modality TherapyDNA, NeoplasmEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene DosageHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisTelomereBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, NeoplasmBiomarkerscfDNADiagnosisEndometrial cancerEndometrial hyperplasiaTelomere length

Identifiers

PMID32462419
OpenAlexW3031058158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.