ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020
The decision-making process, experience, and perceptions of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) users.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproductive Decision-Making Among BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants Carriers and Physicians: Attitudes Toward Preimplantation and Prenatal Genetic Testing.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on supporting individuals with NF1 during pregnancy and decision-making processes.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Imagining and Preventing the Future Existence of Bodies with Variations in Sex Characteristics.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- Reproductive decision-making for Barth syndrome carriers: Unexplored complexities.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- 'When Lightning Strikes Twice'-Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Two Indications in One Biopsy.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- The need for assisted reproductive technology regulations: a case for women in the Philippines.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Aboriginal families living with MJD in remote Australia: questions of access and equity.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Advancements and Applications of Preimplantation Genetic Testing in In Vitro Fertilization: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: challenges in clinical practice.Human genomics · 2022Review
- Clinical Outcome, Socioeconomic Status and Psychological Constrains of Patients Undergoing Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) in Northern Greece.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- The Special Features of Prenatal and Preimplantation Genetic Counseling in Arab Countries.Genes · 2022Review
- Expanded clinical validation of Haploseek for comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe decision to undergo preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) entails a variety of personal and societal variables. Although PGT technology is widely accepted and used, few studies have queried the motives and concerns of PGT users; moreover, in-depth qualitative data regarding the PGT experience is scant.
methodsIn order to explore and analyze the experience, concerns, expectations, and attitudes toward the PGT technique and its implications, semi-structured interviews were conducted in a single tertiary medical center with 43 Israeli PGT users for HLA matching and autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked genetic disorders.
resultsThe primary considerations in choosing PGT were prevention of birth of a child who would suffer a terminal or chronic disease as well as abrogation of a familial genetic condition. Religion played a decisive role in accepting PGT as an antenatal option. Regarding satisfaction with the PGT experience, many interviewees highlighted the need for greater attention to be given to potential stages of failure throughout the procedure and the need for emotional support. Our clinical results regarding implantation rate and cumulative live birth rate are 38-40% and 27-30%, respectively.
conclusionThis survey broadens understanding of the specialized needs of women, couples, and minority groups undergoing PGT and underscores the relevance of counseling services for PGT users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.