Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462396›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021

Positioning error analysis of the fraxion localization system in the intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of tumors.

D-C He, Z-J Zhu, X-Y Zhang, Y Zhang, J Hong, T-T Shi, C-H Yu, J-H Han

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Surface guided radiation therapy with an innovative open-face mask and mouth bite: patient motion management in brain stereotactic radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

D-C HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1 Huanghe Road West, Huaiyin District, Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223300, People's Republic of China.
Z-J ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1 Huanghe Road West, Huaiyin District, Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223300, People's Republic of China.
X-Y ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1 Huanghe Road West, Huaiyin District, Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223300, People's Republic of China.
Y ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1 Huanghe Road West, Huaiyin District, Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223300, People's Republic of China.
J HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1 Huanghe Road West, Huaiyin District, Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223300, People's Republic of China.
T-T ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1 Huanghe Road West, Huaiyin District, Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223300, People's Republic of China.
C-H YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1 Huanghe Road West, Huaiyin District, Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223300, People's Republic of China.
J-H HanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 1 Huanghe Road West, Huaiyin District, Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223300, People's Republic of China. hanjh220@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-6047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate positioning error analysis of the Fraxion localization system in the intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of tumors.

methods64 patients were divided into two groups: a control group (36 patients with the standard thermoplastic mask) and a model group (28 patients with the Fraxion localization system). 3D images of the treated position were obtained by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Positioning errors were obtained by, respectively, registering these two sets of CBCT images to planning CT images, using a 6°-freedom robotic patient positioning system (HexaPOD Evo RT System). The changes in positioning errors with the Fraxion localization system and with the standard thermoplastic mask were analyzed.

resultsCBCT scan results of the model group showed that the mean of linear error of three directions [superior-inferior (SI), lateral (LAT), and anterior-posterior (AP)] was 0.710 ± 0.676 mm, 0.817 ± 0.687 mm, and 0.710 ± 0.685 mm, respectively. The corresponding PTV was 1.23 mm, 1.26 mm, and 1.36 mm. The differences between the 3D images and the planned CT images were significant (p < 0.001).

conclusionThe Fraxion radiotherapy system can not only improve the positioning accuracy and reduce positioning errors but also narrow the PTV margin and reduce the radiated volume of normal tissue.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMasksMiddle AgedPatient PositioningRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy Setup ErrorsFraxionIntracranial tumorsLocalization systemPositioning errorsStereotactic radiotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.