Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462367›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020

Revolutions in treatment options in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): the latest updates

Sheima Farag, Myles J Smith, Nicos Fotiadis, Anastasia Constantinidou, Robin L Jones

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05453292 (Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of EUS-guided Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05453292 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of EUS-guided Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades DigestivasRan2024 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsGastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)ArmsEndoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheima FaragSarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital (NHS Foundation Trust) and Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Myles J SmithSarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital (NHS Foundation Trust) and Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Nicos FotiadisSarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital (NHS Foundation Trust) and Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Anastasia ConstantinidouMedical School University of Cyprus and BoC Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Robin L JonesSarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital (NHS Foundation Trust) and Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK. Robin.Jones@rmh.nhs.uk.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cyprus · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe treatment of advanced GIST is rapidly evolving with the development of novel molecular compounds such as avapritinib and ripretinib, but also promising results have been achieved with cabozantinib in a phase II trial. The availability of over five lines of treatment for patients with advanced GIST is likely to completely shift the current second-line and third-line treatment options, and will also potentially enable a personalised approach to treatment. Imatinib will most likely remain as the first-line treatment of choice for the vast majority of GIST patients. However, for GIST patients with tumours harbouring a D842V mutation in PDGFRA exon 18, avapritinib has shown efficacy and will become first-line therapy for this molecular subgroup. For second- and third-line treatment, results are awaited of a number of clinical trials. However, second-line and further treatment could potentially be tailored depending on secondary mutations found in imatinib-resistant GISTs. As secondary resistance to TKIs remains the biggest challenge in the treatment of GIST and despite negative results with alternating regimens in phase II, combination treatments should be further evaluated to tackle this issue. Moreover, the favourable safety profiles observed with avapritinib and ripretinib suggest that combination treatments are feasible, for instance, combining two TKIs or a TKI with drugs targeting downstream signalling pathways, such as PI3K inhibitors or MEK inhibitors. Finally, in line with further personalisation of treatment in GIST, a multidisciplinary approach is essential, and local treatment options, such as RFA, resection in case of unifocal progression, and radiotherapy, should be considered.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansRetreatmentTreatment OutcomeAvapritinibGastrointestinal stromal tumourGISTRipretinibTKITyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32462367
PMCPMC7253383
OpenAlexW3032683500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.