Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462281›Full record

ReviewJournal of mathematical neuroscience2020

Understanding the dynamics of biological and neural oscillator networks through exact mean-field reductions: a review.

Christian Bick, Marc Goodfellow, Carlo R Laing, Erik A Martens

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mathematical neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An order parameter for synchronisation of angular velocities.The European physical journal. Special topics · 2026
    Article
  5. Deep oscillatory neural network.Scientific reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Harnessing Intelligence from Brain Cells In Vitro.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The functional role of oscillatory dynamics in neocortical circuits: A computational perspective.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Christian BickCentre for Systems, Dynamics, and Control, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. c.bick@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-1146
Marc GoodfellowDepartment of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Carlo R LaingSchool of Natural and Computational Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-2978
Erik A MartensDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. eama@dtu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9455-7517
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · GBMassey University · NZUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT105618MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many biological and neural systems can be seen as networks of interacting periodic processes. Importantly, their functionality, i.e., whether these networks can perform their function or not, depends on the emerging collective dynamics of the network. Synchrony of oscillations is one of the most prominent examples of such collective behavior and has been associated both with function and dysfunction. Understanding how network structure and interactions, as well as the microscopic properties of individual units, shape the emerging collective dynamics is critical to find factors that lead to malfunction. However, many biological systems such as the brain consist of a large number of dynamical units. Hence, their analysis has either relied on simplified heuristic models on a coarse scale, or the analysis comes at a huge computational cost. Here we review recently introduced approaches, known as the Ott-Antonsen and Watanabe-Strogatz reductions, allowing one to simplify the analysis by bridging small and large scales. Thus, reduced model equations are obtained that exactly describe the collective dynamics for each subpopulation in the oscillator network via few collective variables only. The resulting equations are next-generation models: Rather than being heuristic, they exactly link microscopic and macroscopic descriptions and therefore accurately capture microscopic properties of the underlying system. At the same time, they are sufficiently simple to analyze without great computational effort. In the last decade, these reduction methods have become instrumental in understanding how network structure and interactions shape the collective dynamics and the emergence of synchrony. We review this progress based on concrete examples and outline possible limitations. Finally, we discuss how linking the reduced models with experimental data can guide the way towards the development of new treatment approaches, for example, for neurological disease.

Indexed as

Coupled oscillatorsKuramoto modelMean-field reductionsNetwork dynamicsNeural massesNeural networksOtt–Antonsen reductionQuadratic integrate-and-fire neuronsStructured networksTheta neuron modelWatanabe–Strogatz reductionWinfree model

Identifiers

PMID32462281
PMCPMC7253574
OpenAlexW2912307378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.