ReviewJournal of mathematical neuroscience2020
Understanding the dynamics of biological and neural oscillator networks through exact mean-field reductions: a review.
Review in Journal of mathematical neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Metric validation for detection of delayed and directed coupling.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- A principal component entropy metric for assessing global synchronicity in EEG signals.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An order parameter for synchronisation of angular velocities.The European physical journal. Special topics · 2026Article
- Deep oscillatory neural network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Harnessing Intelligence from Brain Cells In Vitro.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025Review
- Temporal resolution of spike coding in feedforward networks with signal convergence and divergence.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Mean-field analysis of synaptic alterations underlying deficient cortical gamma oscillations in schizophrenia.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Direct and Retrograde Wave Propagation in Unidirectionally Coupled Wilson-Cowan Oscillators.Physical review letters · 2025Article
- The functional role of oscillatory dynamics in neocortical circuits: A computational perspective.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Dynamic Network Plasticity and Sample Efficiency in Biological Neural Cultures: A Comparative Study with Deep Reinforcement Learning.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing treatment for disorders of consciousness: a multidisciplinary review of advancements in deep brain stimulation.Military Medical Research · 2024Review
- Whole brain functional connectivity: Insights from next generation neural mass modelling incorporating electrical synapses.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Detailed-level modelling of influence spreading on complex networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evoked resonant neural activity long-term dynamics can be reproduced by a computational model with vesicle depletion.Neurobiology of disease · 2024Article
- Model-agnostic neural mean field with a data-driven transfer function.Neuromorphic computing and engineering · 2024Article
- Mean-field analysis of synaptic alterations underlying deficient cortical gamma oscillations in schizophrenia.Research square · 2024Article
- Neuronal travelling waves explain rotational dynamics in experimental datasets and modelling.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Model-Agnostic Neural Mean Field With The Refractory SoftPlus Transfer Function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Many biological and neural systems can be seen as networks of interacting periodic processes. Importantly, their functionality, i.e., whether these networks can perform their function or not, depends on the emerging collective dynamics of the network. Synchrony of oscillations is one of the most prominent examples of such collective behavior and has been associated both with function and dysfunction. Understanding how network structure and interactions, as well as the microscopic properties of individual units, shape the emerging collective dynamics is critical to find factors that lead to malfunction. However, many biological systems such as the brain consist of a large number of dynamical units. Hence, their analysis has either relied on simplified heuristic models on a coarse scale, or the analysis comes at a huge computational cost. Here we review recently introduced approaches, known as the Ott-Antonsen and Watanabe-Strogatz reductions, allowing one to simplify the analysis by bridging small and large scales. Thus, reduced model equations are obtained that exactly describe the collective dynamics for each subpopulation in the oscillator network via few collective variables only. The resulting equations are next-generation models: Rather than being heuristic, they exactly link microscopic and macroscopic descriptions and therefore accurately capture microscopic properties of the underlying system. At the same time, they are sufficiently simple to analyze without great computational effort. In the last decade, these reduction methods have become instrumental in understanding how network structure and interactions shape the collective dynamics and the emergence of synchrony. We review this progress based on concrete examples and outline possible limitations. Finally, we discuss how linking the reduced models with experimental data can guide the way towards the development of new treatment approaches, for example, for neurological disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.