ReviewDer Internist2020
[Checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin lymphoma].
Review in Der Internist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics of relapsed and refractory paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma; a 10-year retrospective study of an LMIC.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- Advances in single-cell RNA sequencing and its applications in cancer research.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCheckpoint blockade contributes to the immunosuppressive microenvironment in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and in particular the interaction of Hodgkin cells and macrophages with T‑cells and natural killer cells via programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1).
objectivesThe aim of this article is the evaluation the role and potential of checkpoint blockade in cHL as compared with the results of standard chemo- and radiotherapy.
methodsWe analyzed preclinical and clinical data from phase I and phase II studies with checkpoint blockade in cHL. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In 60-70% of patients with chemotherapy-refractory cHL, PD‑1 blockade results in responses. Overall survival is excellent and a small number of patients achieve persistent response. Thus, the use of anti-PD‑1 monoclonal antibodies has become an important treatment approach in relapsed cHL in line with the label. The results of first-line therapy are still preliminary; initial phase II studies using nivolumab in combination with doxorubicin (=adriamycin), vinblastin and dacarbazin (AVD) in early unfavorable or advanced stages showed response rates of up to 90%. Thus, implementing immunomodulatory approaches using PD 1‑blockade have resulted in a significant reduction of chemotherapy. This might represent a paradigm shift in the therapy of cHL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.