Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462244›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020

Production and characterization of a monoclonal antibody against the sialidase of Gardnerella vaginalis using a synthetic peptide in a MAP8 format.

Karen Cortés-Sarabia, Cynthia Rodríguez-Nava, Yolanda Medina-Flores, Olga Mata-Ruíz, Joel E López-Meza, Miying Dessire Gómez-Cervantes, Isela Parra-Rojas, Berenice Illades-Aguiar, Eugenia Flores-Alfaro, Amalia Vences-Velázquez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nanophotonic Sialidase Immunoassay for Bacterial Vaginosis Diagnosis.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen Cortés-SarabiaFacultad de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico.
Cynthia Rodríguez-NavaFacultad de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico.
Yolanda Medina-FloresLaboratorio de Anticuerpos Monoclonales, Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos "Dr. Manuel Martínez Báez", Francisco de P. Miranda 177, Lomas de Plateros, 01480, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Olga Mata-RuízLaboratorio de Anticuerpos Monoclonales, Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos "Dr. Manuel Martínez Báez", Francisco de P. Miranda 177, Lomas de Plateros, 01480, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Joel E López-MezaCentro Multidisciplinario de Estudios en Biotecnología, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico.
Miying Dessire Gómez-CervantesFacultad de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico.
Isela Parra-RojasFacultad de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico.
Berenice Illades-AguiarFacultad de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico.
Eugenia Flores-AlfaroFacultad de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico.
Amalia Vences-VelázquezFacultad de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico. ameliavences.v@uagro.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-1401
Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero · MXSecretaria de Salud · MXUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo · MX

Funding

PFCE 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis is one of the most frequent vaginal infections. Its main etiological agent is Gardnerella vaginalis, which produces several virulence factors involved in vaginal infection and colonization, in particular, sialidase (SLD), a potential clinical biomarker that participates in immune response modulation and mucus degradation. The main objective of this work was the production and evaluation of a monoclonal antibody against G. vaginalis sialidase and its validation in immunoassays. For immunization of mice, a synthetic multiantigenic peptide was used, and hybridomas were generated. After fusion, hybridomas were evaluated for antibody production and cloned by limited dilution. One clone producing IgG1 was selected and characterized by indirect ELISA, dot blot, and Western blot, and we also tested clinical isolates and HeLa cells infected with G. vaginalis. The results showed that the anti-SLD antibody recognized a single protein of ~90 kDa that correlated with the estimated molecular weight of SLD. In addition, anti-SLD antibody recognized SLD from complete bacteria and from culture supernatants of infected Hela cells. In conclusion, our results showed that the anti-SLD antibody recognized SLD from different sources and could be considered a new tool for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. KEY POINTS: • Anti-sialidase mAb was generated using a synthetic peptide • The mAb recognizes synthetic peptide and intact protein from multiple sources • The antibody was characterized by several immunological methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBacterial ProteinsFemaleGardnerella vaginalisHeLa CellsHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeuraminidasePeptidesVaginosis, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalBacterial ProteinsNeuraminidasePeptidesBacterial vaginosisGardnerella vaginalisMonoclonal antibodySialidase

Identifiers

PMID32462244
PMCPMC7253150
OpenAlexW3028950483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.