ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Succinct dynamic de Bruijn graphs.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Conway-Bromage-Lyndon (CBL): an exact, dynamic representation of k-mer sets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Scalable sequence database search using partitioned aggregated Bloom comb trees.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Buffering updates enables efficient dynamic de Bruijn graphs.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe de Bruijn graph is one of the fundamental data structures for analysis of high throughput sequencing data. In order to be applicable to population-scale studies, it is essential to build and store the graph in a space- and time-efficient manner. In addition, due to the ever-changing nature of population studies, it has become essential to update the graph after construction, e.g. add and remove nodes and edges. Although there has been substantial effort on making the construction and storage of the graph efficient, there is a limited amount of work in building the graph in an efficient and mutable manner. Hence, most space efficient data structures require complete reconstruction of the graph in order to add or remove edges or nodes.
resultsIn this article, we present DynamicBOSS, a succinct representation of the de Bruijn graph that allows for an unlimited number of additions and deletions of nodes and edges. We compare our method with other competing methods and demonstrate that DynamicBOSS is the only method that supports both addition and deletion and is applicable to very large samples (e.g. greater than 15 billion k-mers). Competing dynamic methods, e.g. FDBG cannot be constructed on large scale datasets, or cannot support both addition and deletion, e.g. BiFrost. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DynamicBOSS is publicly available at https://github.com/baharpan/dynboss. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.