Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462136›Full record

ArticleWater research X2020

Practical implementation of true on-site water recycling systems for hand washing and toilet flushing.

Eva Reynaert, Esther E Greenwood, Bonginkosi Ndwandwe, Michel E Riechmann, Rebecca C Sindall, Kai M Udert, Eberhard Morgenroth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Technologies for pollutant removal and resource recovery from blackwater: a review.Frontiers of environmental science & engineering · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva ReynaertEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Esther E GreenwoodEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Bonginkosi NdwandweUniversity of KwaZulu Natal, Pollution Research Group, 4041, Durban, South Africa.
Michel E RiechmannEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Rebecca C SindallUniversity of KwaZulu Natal, Pollution Research Group, 4041, Durban, South Africa.
Kai M UdertEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Eberhard MorgenrothEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CHUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On-site wastewater reuse can improve global access to clean water, sanitation and hygiene. We developed a treatment system (aerated bioreactor, ultrafiltration membrane, granular activated carbon and electrolysis for chlorine disinfection) that recycles hand washing and toilet flush water. Three prototypes were field-tested in non-sewered areas, one in Switzerland (hand washing) and two in South Africa (hand washing, toilet flushing), over periods of 63, 74 and 94 days, respectively. We demonstrated that the system is able to recycle sufficient quantities of safe and appealing hand washing and toilet flush water for domestic or public use in real-life applications. Chemical contaminants were effectively removed from the used water in all prototypes. Removal efficiencies were 99.7% for the chemical oxygen demand (COD), 98.5% for total nitrogen (TN) and 99.9% for phosphate in a prototype treating hand washing water, and 99.8% for COD, 95.7% for TN and 89.6% for phosphate in a prototype treating toilet flush water. While this system allowed for true recycling for the same application, most on-site wastewater reuse systems downcycle the treated water, i.e., reuse it for an application requiring lower water quality. An analysis of 18 selected wastewater reuse specifications revealed that at best these guidelines are only partially applicable to innovative recycling systems as they are focused on the downcycling of water to the environment (e.g., use for irrigation). We believe that a paradigm shift is necessary and advocate for the implementation of risk-based (and thus end-use dependent) system performance targets to evaluate water treatment systems, which recycle and not only downcycle water.

Indexed as

Biologically activated membrane bioreactor (BAMBi)Field testHand washingToilet flushingWastewater reuseWater recycling

Identifiers

PMID32462136
PMCPMC7242789
OpenAlexW3016106201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.