Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462103›Full record

ArticleACS omega2019

Insights into Substrate and Inhibitor Selectivity among Human GLUT Transporters through Comparative Modeling and Molecular Docking.

Rafaela Salgado Ferreira, Jean-Luc Pons, Gilles Labesse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafaela Salgado FerreiraCentre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS-5048, INSERM-U1054, Université de Montpellier, 29 Rue de Navacelles, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Jean-Luc PonsCentre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS-5048, INSERM-U1054, Université de Montpellier, 29 Rue de Navacelles, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Gilles LabesseCentre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS-5048, INSERM-U1054, Université de Montpellier, 29 Rue de Navacelles, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The solute carrier 2 family is composed of 14 transporters, which are members of the major facilitator superfamily. Despite their high physiological importance, there are still many open questions concerning their function and specificity, and in some cases, their physiological substrate is still unknown. To understand the determinants of the substrate and inhibitor specificity, we modeled all human glucose transport carriers (GLUTs) and simulated their interaction with known ligands. Comparative modeling was performed with the @TOME-2 pipeline, employing multiple templates and providing an ensemble of models for each GLUT. We analyzed models in both outward-occluded and inward-open conformations, to compare exofacial and endofacial binding sites throughout the family and understand differences in susceptibility of GLUTs to the inhibitor cytochalasin B. Finally, we employed molecular docking and bioinformatics to identify residues likely critical for recognition of myo-inositol by GLUT13 and urate by GLUT9. These results provide insights into the molecular basis for the specificity for these substrates. In addition, we suggested a potential recognition site of glucosamine by GLUT11 to be evaluated in future experiments.

Identifiers

PMID32462103
PMCPMC7244221
OpenAlexW2919140973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.