Spectral density constraints on wireless communication.

Mohammad Kaisb Layous Alhasnawi, Shahab Abdulla, David Fatseas, Ronald G Addie

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad Kaisb Layous AlhasnawiFaculty of Administration and Economics, Sumer University, Thi-Qar, Iraq.

Shahab AbdullaOpen Access College, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.

David FatseasSchool of Agricultural, Computational and Environmental Science, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.

Ronald G AddieSchool of Agricultural, Computational and Environmental Science, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental exposure to man-made electromagnetic field (EMF) has been rising as modern technologies have grown and changes in social behavior have generated more synthetic sources. For safety of human health, EMF levels need to be regulated. The level of EMF should be well below levels where there might be harm, hence we do not expect to see any health effects at these levels. Current regulations fail to place a strict limit on EMF in situations where multiple nearby devices transmit simultaneously. The way these regulations are expressed needs great care because it will have an effect on the design of wireless communication systems. In this paper, it is argued that transmitted power constraints on wireless communication devices should be expressed in a different way, namely that devices should limit the EMF spectral density that they generate to the difference between the maximum allowed, by the standard, and the amount currently present, as measured by the device, in the spectral region where it is active. Note that the limit on EMF should be expressed in terms of its

Indexed as

Computer scienceElectrical engineeringElectromagneticsEMFEMF spectral densityEnvironmental risk assessmentExposure limitsHigh performance computingNetwork (computer science)Power constraintsQuality of lifeRadiation physicsRadiologySignal processingWave physics

Identifiers

PMID32462089

DOI10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03979

PMCPMC7240121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.