ArticleHeliyon2020
Glass ionomer cements compared with composite resin in restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05593159 (Evaluating the Clinical Performance of a Bioactive Restorative Material in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating the Clinical Performance of a Bioactive Restorative Material in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Direct Composite Restorations on Permanent Teeth in the Anterior and Posterior Region - An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline - Part 1: Indications for Composite Restorations.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2024Guideline
- Randomized Clinical Trial of Four Adhesion Strategies in Non-Carious Cervical Lesion Restorations: Five-Year Follow-Up.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Trial
- Periodontal Evaluation for a New Alkasite Restorative Material in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Trial
- Sixty-month comperative evaluation of a glass hybrid restorative and a composite resin in non-carious cervical lesions of bruxist individuals.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Trial
- Two-year randomized clinical trial of different restorative techniques in non-carious cervical lesions and MMP activity in gingival crevicular fluid.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Trial
- Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2021Trial
- Effect of Titanium Dioxide (TiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of Adhesive Strategies with Different Etching Approaches on the Clinical Performance of Restorations in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Effect of adhesive strategy on the shear bond strength of monochromatic and nanohybrid composite resins to glass ionomer cements in the sandwich technique.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Shear Bond Strength of Biointeractive Restorative Materials to NeoMTA Plus and Biodentine.Polymers · 2025Article
- Comparison of clinical performance of glass ionomer cement vs. composite resin in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Review
- Clinical evaluation of giomer-based injectable resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer in class V carious lesions over 18 months: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The development of resin-coating materials for enhancing elemental release of coated glass ionomer cements.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Clinical Effectiveness of Ion-Releasing Restorations versus Composite Restorations in Dental Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
- Clinical Effectiveness of High-viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin as a Restorative Material in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024Review
- Assessment of Occlusal Load Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite in Class V Cavities: An In-Vitro Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Abfraction Lesions Restored with Three Dental Materials: A Comparative Study.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRestoring noncarious cervical lesions are challenging to clinical practice. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance/longevity of glass ionomer cements (GIC) and composite resins (CR) used for noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL) through a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA). DATA: Randomized and controlled clinical trials and nonrandomized clinical trials, which compared the clinical performance/longevity of CR and GIC (conventional and/or resin-modified) in the treatment of NCCL, were included. SOURCE: The methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Seven MAs were performed considering (1) the clinical performance of the parameters in common: retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, color, anatomic form, surface texture and (2) a follow-up time of 12, 24 and 36 months. The prevalence of successful restorations and the total number of restorations per clinical parameter/follow-up time were used to calculate the relative risk (95% CI). STUDY SELECTION: After screening of the studies, 13 studies were used for quantitative synthesis. The risk difference (CI 95%, α, I
conclusionGIC showed a clinical performance significantly higher than CR in regard to retention, whereas for the other parameters, GIC was similar to CR. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: NCCLs is increasingly prevalent among the population and this type of lesion causing defects in the tooth that affect not only aesthetics but also everyday habits, such as drinking, eating and teeth brushing, due to the sensitivity these lesions cause.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.