Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32462000›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Identification and Validation of Prognostically Relevant Gene Signature in Melanoma.

Yali Gao, Yaling Li, Xueli Niu, Yutong Wu, Xiuhao Guan, Yuxiao Hong, Hongduo Chen, Bing Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PCSK9 facilitates melanoma pathogenesis via a network regulating tumor immunity.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Article
  5. Low Expression ofClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yali GaoDepartment of Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 110001 Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5484-2559
Yaling LiDepartment of Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 110001 Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9136-4990
Xueli NiuDepartment of Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 110001 Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-8083
Yutong WuDepartment of Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 110001 Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5897-6813
Xiuhao GuanDepartment of Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 110001 Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1869-2637
Yuxiao HongDepartment of Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 110001 Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2428-8339
Hongduo ChenDepartment of Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 110001 Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-1575
Bing SongDepartment of Dermatology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 110001 Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-2333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, effective genetic markers are limited to predict the clinical outcome of melanoma. High-throughput multiomics sequencing data have provided a valuable approach for the identification of genes associated with cancer prognosis.

methodThe multidimensional data of melanoma patients, including clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic data, were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). These samples were then randomly divided into two groups, one for training dataset and the other for validation dataset. In order to select reliable biomarkers, we screened prognosis-related genes, copy number variation genes, and SNP variation genes and integrated these genes to further select features using random forests in the training dataset. We screened for robust biomarkers and established a gene-related prognostic model. Finally, we verified the selected biomarkers in the test sets (GSE19234 and GSE65904) and on clinical samples extracted from melanoma patients using qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry analysis.

resultsWe obtained 1569 prognostic-related genes and 1101 copy-amplification, 1093 copy-deletions, and 92 significant mutations in genomic variants. These genomic variant genes were closely related to the development of tumors and genes that integrate genomic variation. A total of 141 candidate genes were obtained from prognosis-related genes. Six characteristic genes (

conclusionsWe constructed a 6-gene signature (

Indexed as

MelanomaAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, NeoplasmHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival AnalysisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID32462000
PMCPMC7238332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.