ArticleCureus2020
A Rare Case of Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix with No Intrauterine Diethylstilbestrol Exposure.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in females. Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix is an uncommon histological variant and is usually seen with intrauterine exposure to diethylstilbestrol. A 28-year-old female with no intrauterine exposure to diethylstilbestrol presented with postcoital bleeding. A pelvic exam revealed a cervical mass. Imaging confirmed the cervical mass and positron emission tomography scan showed an increased uptake in the cervical mass as well as the para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes. Biopsy showed a clear cell carcinoma of the cervix. She was treated with cisplatin and paclitaxel for eight cycles and concurrent radiation therapy. She had a complete response to therapy and has been in complete remission nine months from the end of therapy. There are no clear guidelines for the treatment of clear cell carcinoma with current therapy based on the treatment of squamous and non-clear cell adenocarcinoma. Cisplatin and paclitaxel could be an option, given the successful treatment of the patient in our case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.