ArticleWater2020
Simplified Analysis of Measurement Data from A Rapid
Article in Water, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Green Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots and Their Application to the Determination of Sunset Yellow.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing fecal pollution source in a Northern Michigan Lake using qPCR and a community-based monitoring framework.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development of Multiplex RT qPCR Assays for Simultaneous Detection and Quantification of Faecal Indicator Bacteria in Bathing Recreational Waters.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Geospatial Patterns of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in the US EPA National Rivers and Streams Assessment Survey.Environmental science & technology · 2022Article
- Bacterial and viral fecal indicator predictive modeling at three Great Lakes recreational beach sites.Water research · 2022Article
- Large-scale comparison of E. coli levels determined by culture and a qPCR method (EPA Draft Method C) in Michigan towards the implementation of rapid, multi-site beach testing.Journal of microbiological methods · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Draft method C is a standardized method for quantifying
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.