Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32461788›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2020

Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases: Efficiency of standard treatment methods.

Roman Yarema, Мyron Оhorchak, Petro Hyrya, Yuriy Kovalchuk, Victor Safiyan, Ivan Karelin, Severyn Ferneza, Markiyan Fetsych, Myron Matusyak, Yuriy Oliynyk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roman YaremaDepartment of oncology and Radiology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv 79010, Ukraine. roman.yarema@ukr.net.
Мyron ОhorchakDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Lviv Oncological Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Lviv 79000, Ukraine.
Petro HyryaDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Lviv Oncological Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Lviv 79000, Ukraine.
Yuriy KovalchukDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Lviv Oncological Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Lviv 79000, Ukraine.
Victor SafiyanDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Lviv Oncological Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Lviv 79000, Ukraine.
Ivan KarelinDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Lviv Oncological Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Lviv 79000, Ukraine.
Severyn FernezaDepartment of oncology and Radiology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv 79010, Ukraine.
Markiyan FetsychDepartment of oncology and Radiology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv 79010, Ukraine.
Myron MatusyakDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Lviv Oncological Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Lviv 79000, Ukraine.
Yuriy OliynykDepartment of oncology and Radiology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv 79010, Ukraine.
Тaras FetsychDepartment of oncology and Radiology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv 79010, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal metastasis (PM), arising from gastric cancer (GC), is the most common pattern of synchronous and metachronous dissemination and is generally associated with poor prognosis. New therapeutic modalities are being increasingly employed for such patients.

aimTo develop more advanced methods, it becomes necessary to study the results of existing standard treatment methods in patients with PM in order to perform a comparative analysis of the strategies.

methodsA retrospective analysis of the efficiency of standard treatment methods (

resultsThe overall survival (OS) rate in 200 GC patients with PM under standard treatment was 5.4 mo. One-year survival occurred in 18.4% of patients. In multivariate analysis, the survival rate was significantly influenced by the following factors: Presence of extraperitoneal metastases, and stage of PM according to both the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) and the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). The median OS and 1-year survival of patients with Р1, P2, and P3 (JGCA) carcinomatosis were 9.8 mo, 6.7 mo, and 4.0 mo, and 47.2%, 18.8%, and 5.1%, respectively. The application of the palliative gastrectomy resulted in an increase in the median OS by up to 17 mo compared to the conservative approach where the value was 8.5 mo (

conclusionGC patients with PM are characterized by extremely poor prognoses. Long-term survivors were found in the group with PCI of 1-6 points, and there was no survival difference in groups with PCI 7-12

Indexed as

Gastric cancerPalliative treatment methodsPeritoneal cancer indexPeritoneal metastases

Identifiers

PMID32461788
PMCPMC7235180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.