Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32461609›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Genome and single-cell RNA-sequencing of the earthworm Eisenia andrei identifies cellular mechanisms underlying regeneration.

Yong Shao, Xiao-Bo Wang, Jin-Jin Zhang, Ming-Li Li, Shou-Song Wu, Xi-Yao Ma, Xue Wang, Hui-Fang Zhao, Yuan Li, Helen He Zhu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. DNA Methylation Dynamics inBiomolecules · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. LumbriCyc: towards metabolic modelling of earthworms.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yong Shao *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Xiao-Bo Wang *Agricultural Genomics Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, China.
Jin-Jin Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Ming-Li Li *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Shou-Song WuGuanglong Earthworm Breeding Institute, Lingshan, Guangxi, China.
Xi-Yao MaState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Xue WangState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji-Med-X Stem Cell Research Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Hui-Fang ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji-Med-X Stem Cell Research Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yuan LiNextomics Biosciences Institute, 430000, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Helen He ZhuState Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Renji-Med-X Stem Cell Research Center, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
David M IrwinState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6131-4933
De-Peng WangNextomics Biosciences Institute, 430000, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Guo-Jie ZhangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China. guojie.zhang@bio.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6860-1521
Jue RuanAgricultural Genomics Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, China. ruanjue@caas.cn.
Dong-Dong WuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China. wudongdong@mail.kiz.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-7297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The earthworm is particularly fascinating to biologists because of its strong regenerative capacity. However, many aspects of its regeneration in nature remain elusive. Here we report chromosome-level genome, large-scale transcriptome and single-cell RNA-sequencing data during earthworm (Eisenia andrei) regeneration. We observe expansion of LINE2 transposable elements and gene families functionally related to regeneration (for example, EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor) particularly for genes exhibiting differential expression during earthworm regeneration. Temporal gene expression trajectories identify transcriptional regulatory factors that are potentially crucial for initiating cell proliferation and differentiation during regeneration. Furthermore, early growth response genes related to regeneration are transcriptionally activated in both the earthworm and planarian. Meanwhile, single-cell RNA-sequencing provides insight into the regenerative process at a cellular level and finds that the largest proportion of cells present during regeneration are stem cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationExome SequencingGene Expression ProfilingOligochaetaRegenerationRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalRNA-SeqWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32461609
PMCPMC7253469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.