Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32461343›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Granzyme B PET imaging of immune-mediated tumor killing as a tool for understanding immunotherapy response.

Thomas LaSalle, Emily E Austin, Grant Rigney, Eric Wehrenberg-Klee, Sarah Nesti, Benjamin Larimer, Umar Mahmood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Development of a novelJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Sonopermeation combined with stroma normalization enables complete cure using nano-immunotherapy in murine breast tumors.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas LaSalleRadiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Emily E AustinRadiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Grant RigneyRadiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Eric Wehrenberg-KleeRadiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah NestiRadiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Benjamin LarimerRadiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA umahmood@mgh.harvard.edu blarimer@uab.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1288-7206
Umar MahmoodRadiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA umahmood@mgh.harvard.edu blarimer@uab.edu.

Funding

Cytotoxic lymphocyte function PET imaging to predict cancer immunotherapy responseR01CA214744 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MAHMOOD, UMAR · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Quantitative PET Imaging for Oncologic Immune Response PredictionR00CA215604 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LARIMER, BENJAMIN M · 2019 to 2021
$703k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA215604NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer immunotherapy research is expanding to include a more robust understanding of the mechanisms of treatment response and resistance. Identification of drivers of pro-tumor and anti-tumor immunity during treatment offers new strategies for effective alternative or combination immunotherapies. Currently, tissue or blood samples are collected and analyzed, then dichotomized based on clinical end points that may occur months or years after tissue is collected. While overall survival is ultimately the desired clinical outcome, this dichotomization fails to incorporate the nuances that may occur during an anti-tumor response. By failing to directly measure immune activation at the time of sampling, tumors may be misclassified and potentially obscure important biological information. Non-invasive techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET), allow for global and quantitative measurements of cancer specific processes and are widely used clinically to help manage disease.

methodsWe have previously developed a novel PET agent that can non-invasively quantify granzyme B release in tumors and have demonstrated its ability to predict response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in multiple murine models of cancer. Here, we used the quantitative measurement of granzyme B release as a direct and time-matched marker of immune cell activation in order to determine immune cell types and cytokines that correlate with effective checkpoint inhibitor therapy in both tumors and tumor-draining lymph nodes.

resultsThrough PET imaging, we were able to successfully distinguish distinct microenvironments, based on tumor type, which influenced immune cell subpopulations and cytokine release. Although each tumor was marked by functionally distinct pathways of immune cell activation and inflammation, they also shared commonalities that ultimately resulted in granzyme B release and tumor killing.

conclusionsThese results suggest that discrete tumor immune microenvironments can be identified in both responsive and non-responsive tumors and offers strategic targets for intervention to overcome checkpoint inhibitor resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsGranzymesHumansImmunotherapyMicePositron-Emission TomographyTumor MicroenvironmentGranzymesPETPET, functional imagingPET, ligand studies

Identifiers

PMID32461343
PMCPMC7254099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.