Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32461298›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Protocol for hypofractionated adaptive radiotherapy to the bladder within a multicentre phase II randomised trial: radiotherapy planning and delivery guidance.

Shaista Hafeez, Emma Patel, Amanda Webster, Karole Warren-Oseni, Vibeke Hansen, Helen McNair, Elizabeth Miles, Rebecca Lewis, Emma Hall, Robert Huddart

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01810757 (A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Study of HYpofractionated Bladder Radiotherapy With or Without Image Guided aDaptive Planning), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01810757 nacompletednot on this map

A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Study of HYpofractionated Bladder Radiotherapy With or Without Image Guided aDaptive Planning

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Cancer Research, United KingdomRan2014 to 2023Enrolled65ConditionsBladder CancerArmsStandard planning radiotherapy, Adaptive planning radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recognising the challenges of implementing multi-centre adaptive plan of the day radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaista HafeezRadiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK shaista.hafeez@icr.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2057-0946
Emma PatelMount Vernon Hospital, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Northwood, UK.
Amanda WebsterMount Vernon Hospital, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Northwood, UK.
Karole Warren-OseniRadiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Vibeke HansenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Helen McNairRadiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Elizabeth MilesMount Vernon Hospital, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Northwood, UK.
Rebecca LewisClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Emma HallClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Robert HuddartRadiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBMount Vernon Hospital · GBOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14744Cancer Research UK 28284Cancer Research UK CRUK/12/055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are unfit and unsuitable for standard radical treatment with cystectomy or daily radiotherapy present a large unmet clinical need. Untreated, they suffer high cancer specific mortality and risk significant disease-related local symptoms. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (delivering higher doses in fewer fractions/visits) is a potential treatment solution but could be compromised by the mobile nature of the bladder, resulting in target misses in a significant proportion of fractions. Adaptive 'plan of the day' image-guided radiotherapy delivery may improve the precision and accuracy of treatment. We aim to demonstrate within a randomised multicentre phase II trial feasibility of plan of the day hypofractionated bladder radiotherapy delivery with acceptable rates of toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with T2-T4aN0M0 MIBC receiving 36 Gy in 6-weekly fractions are randomised (1:1) between treatment delivered using a single-standard plan or adaptive radiotherapy using a library of three plans (small, medium and large). A cone beam CT taken prior to each treatment is used to visualise the anatomy and select the most appropriate plan depending on the bladder shape and size. A comprehensive radiotherapy quality assurance programme has been instituted to ensure standardisation of radiotherapy planning and delivery. The primary endpoint is to exclude ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the London-Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee (13/LO/1350). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and submission to regulatory authorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01810757.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCystectomyHumansLondonMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbladder disordersoncologyradiation oncologyradiotherapyurological tumours

Identifiers

PMID32461298
PMCPMC7259864
OpenAlexW3030022471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.