Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32461262›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of ophthalmology2021

Two-year interim safety results of the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema: the observational PALADIN study.

Sam E Mansour, Daniel F Kiernan, Daniel B Roth, David Eichenbaum, Nancy M Holekamp, Samer Kaba, Erica Werts

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02424019 (A Phase 4 Safety Study of IOP Signals in Patients Treated With ILUVIEN®), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02424019 phase4completednot on this map

A Phase 4 Safety Study of IOP Signals in Patients Treated With ILUVIEN® (Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant) 0.19 mg

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlimera SciencesRan2015 to 2020Enrolled153ConditionsDiabetic Macular Edema (DME)ArmsILUVIEN 0.19 MG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent Advancements in the Medical Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sam E MansourOphthalmology, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA sm@virginiaretina.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0345-0467
Daniel F KiernanOphthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Center, New York, New York, USA.
Daniel B RothOphthalmology, Rutger Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
David EichenbaumRetina Vitreous Associates of Florida, St Petersburg, Florida, USA.
Nancy M HolekampPepose Vision Institute, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA.
Samer KabaAlimera Sciences, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.
Erica WertsAlimera Sciences, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.
Alimera Sciences (United States) · USGeorge Washington University · USJohnson University · USOphthalmic Consultants of Long Island · USPepose Vision Institute · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant delivers continuous, low-dose, intravitreal corticosteroid for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). This ongoing, 3-year, observational clinical trial provides long-term, 'real-world' safety results for the FAc implant in DMO.

methodsThis 24-month interim analysis of a prospective, observational study investigated patients with DMO receiving the commercially available intravitreal 0.2 µg/day FAc implant. The primary outcome was incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering procedures. Other IOP-related signals and their relationship to previous corticosteroid exposure, best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield thickness (CST), ocular adverse events and frequency of other treatments were also measured.

resultsData were collected from 95 previously steroid-challenged patients (115 study eyes) for up to 36 months pre-FAc and 24 months post-FAc implant. Mean IOP for the overall population remained stable post-FAc compared with pre-FAc implant. IOP-related procedures remained infrequent (two IOP-lowering surgeries pre-FAc; two trabeculoplasties and four IOP-lowering surgeries post-FAc). Mean visual acuity was stable post-FAc (mean improvement of 1-3 letters) and fewer DMO treatments were required per year following FAc implant. Mean CST was significantly reduced at 24 months post-FAc implant (p<0.001) and the percentage of patients with CST ≤300 µm was significantly increased (p=0.041).

conclusionFew IOP-related procedures were reported during the 24 months post-FAc implant. Positive efficacy outcomes were noted after treatment, with stabilisation of vision and reduction in inflammation, demonstrated by CST. The FAc implant has a favourable benefit-risk profile in the management of DMO, especially when administered after a prior steroid challenge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02424019.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedDiabetic RetinopathyDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug ImplantsFemaleFluocinolone AcetonideFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansIntraocular PressureIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMacular EdemaMaleProspective StudiesDrug ImplantsFluocinolone AcetonideGlucocorticoidsinflammationintraocular pressuremacularetinatreatment other

Identifiers

PMID32461262
PMCPMC7907551
OpenAlexW3032550975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.