Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32461191›Full record

ArticleVirus research2020

Genotype by environment cultivar evaluation for cassava brown streak disease resistance in Tanzania.

Rudolph R Shirima, James P Legg, Daniel G Maeda, Silver Tumwegamire, Geoffrey Mkamilo, Kiddo Mtunda, Heneriko Kulembeka, Innocent Ndyetabula, Bernadetha P Kimata, Dwasi Gambo Matondo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virus research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rudolph R ShirimaIITA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
James P LeggIITA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Electronic address: j.legg@cgiar.org.
Daniel G MaedaUniversity of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Silver TumwegamireIITA, Kigali, Rwanda.
Geoffrey MkamiloTanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Makutupora, Tanzania.
Kiddo MtundaTanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Tumbi, Tanzania.
Heneriko KulembekaTanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Ukiriguru, Tanzania.
Innocent NdyetabulaTanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Maruku, Tanzania.
Bernadetha P KimataTanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Naliendele, Tanzania.
Dwasi Gambo MatondoTanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Naliendele, Tanzania.
Gloria CeasarIITA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Edda MushiIITA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Karoline SichalweTanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Kibaha, Tanzania.
Edward KanjuIITA, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cassava brown steak disease (CBSD), caused by Cassava brown streak virus (CBSV) and Ugandan cassava brown streak virus (UCBSV), is the most important biotic constraint to cassava production in East and Central Africa. Concerted efforts are required to prevent further spread into West Africa as well as to reduce losses in areas already affected. The study reported here was part of a five-country (Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania and Uganda) programme that aimed to identify superior cassava cultivars resistant to CBSD and to disseminate them widely in the region. Seventeen tissue-cultured and virus-tested cultivars were evaluated in Tanzania across nine sites with diverse CBSD inoculum conditions. Experiments were planted using an alpha-lattice design and assessments were made of surrounding inoculum pressure, CBSD foliar and root incidence and root yield at harvest. There were large differences in CBSD infection between sites, with greatest spread recorded from the north-western Lake (Victoria) zone. Differences were driven by Bemisia tabaci whitefly vector abundance and CBSD inoculum pressure. Both CBSV and UCBSV were almost equally represented in cassava fields surrounding experimental plots, although CBSV predominated in the north-west whilst UCBSV was more frequent in coastal and southern sites. However, the incidence of CBSV was much greater than that of UCBSV in initially virus-free experimental plots, suggesting that CBSV is more virulent. Cultivars could be categorised into three groups based on the degree of CBSD symptom expression in shoots and roots. The seven cultivars (F10_30R2, Eyope, Mkumba, Mkuranga1, Narocass1, Nase3 and Orera) in the most resistant category each had shoot and root incidences of less than 20%. Fresh root yield differed between sites and cultivars, but there was no genotype by environment interaction for this trait, probably attributable to the large fertility and soil moisture differences between sites. Susceptible cultivars and the local check performed well in the absence of CBSD pressure, highlighting the importance of exploiting quality and yield traits of local landraces in breeding programmes. Overall, our results emphasized the importance of applying a balanced strategy for CBSD management. This should use both improved and local germplasm resources to generate high yielding cultivars for specific end-user traits, and combine the deployment of improved cultivars with phytosanitary control measures including the use of healthy planting material and planting during periods of reduced CBSD infection.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceGenotypeManihotPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPotyviridaeRNA, ViralSequence Analysis, DNATanzaniaRNA, Viralagro-ecological zoneCassavaCBSVresistanceUCBSVyield

Identifiers

PMID32461191
PMCPMC7450270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.