Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32460995›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2020

The impact of near-infrared angiography and proctoscopy after rectosigmoid resection and anastomosis performed during surgeries for gynecologic malignancies.

Lea A Moukarzel, Maureen E Byrne, Stephanie Leiva, Michelle Wu, Qin C Zhou, Alexia Iasonos, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Yukio Sonoda, Ginger Gardner, Mario M Leitao and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Molecular image-guided surgery in gynaecological cancer: where do we stand?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
  6. ARIA II: a randomized controlled trial of near-infrared Angiography during RectosIgmoid resection and Anastomosis in women with ovarian cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lea A MoukarzelGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Maureen E ByrneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stephanie LeivaDepartment of Surgery, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA.
Michelle WuEpidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Qin C ZhouEpidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Alexia IasonosEpidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Nadeem R Abu-RustumGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Yukio SonodaGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Ginger GardnerGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Mario M LeitaoGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Vance A BroachGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Dennis S ChiGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Kara Long RocheGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Oliver ZivanovicGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: zivanovo@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USHurley Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
TRANSLATIONAL CONTROL IN ADAPTATION TO HYPOXIAP01CA104838 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DIEHL, JOHN ALAN · 2004 to 2018
$17.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA104838NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReducing anastomotic leak rates after rectosigmoid resection and anastomosis is a priority in patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery. Therefore, we investigated the implications of performing near-infrared angiography (NIR) via proctoscopy to assess anastomotic perfusion at the time of rectosigmoid resection and anastomosis.

methodsWe identified all patients who underwent rectosigmoid resection and anastomosis for a gynecologic malignancy between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018. NIR proctoscopy was assessed via the PINPOINT Endoscopic Imaging System (Stryker).

resultsA total of 410 patients were identified, among whom NIR was utilized in 133 (32.4%). There were no statistically significant differences in age, race, BMI, type of malignancy, surgery, histology, FIGO stage, hypertension, diabetes, or preoperative chemotherapy between NIR and non-NIR groups. All cases of rectosigmoid resection underwent stapled anastomosis. The anastomotic leak rate was 2/133 (1.5%) in the NIR cohort compared with 13/277 (4.7%) in the non-NIR cohort (p = 0.16). Diverting ostomy was performed in 9/133 (6.8%) NIR and 53/277 (19.9%) non-NIR patients (p < 0.001). Postoperative abscesses occurred in 8/133 (6.0%) NIR and 44/277 (15.9%) non-NIR patients (p = 0.004). The NIR cohort had significantly fewer post-operative interventional procedures (12/133, 9.0% NIR vs. 55/277, 19.9% non-NIR, p = 0.006) and significantly fewer 30-day readmissions (14/133, 10.5% NIR vs. 61/277, 22% non-NIR, p = 0.004).

conclusionsNIR proctoscopy is a safe tool for assessing anastomotic rectal perfusion after rectosigmoid resection and anastomosis, with a low anastomotic leak rate of 1.5%. Its potential usefulness should be evaluated in randomized trials in patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakCohort StudiesColon, SigmoidCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleFluorescein AngiographyGenital Neoplasms, FemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMiddle AgedProctoscopyRectumAnastomotic leaksGynecological malignanciesNear-infrared angiographyProctoscopyRectosigmoid resection

Identifiers

PMID32460995
PMCPMC7693678
OpenAlexW3027558333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.