Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32460855›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2020

The Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative Composite Cognitive Test: a practical measure for tracking cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Jessica B Langbaum, Noel N Ellison, Angelika Caputo, Ronald G Thomas, Carolyn Langlois, Marie-Emmanuelle Riviere, Ana Graf, Cristina Lopez Lopez, Eric M Reiman, Pierre N Tariot and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. "Time Saved" Calculations to Improve Decision-Making in Progressive Disease Studies.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024
    Trial
  2. Data‑driven cognitive composites predict Aβ‑related decline and progression to MCI: the ADOPIC study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Poor dream recall associates with Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and dementia risk.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. SV2A PET shows hippocampal synaptic loss in cognitively unimpaired APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica B LangbaumBanner Alzheimer's Institute, 901 E. Willetta Street, Phoenix, AZ, USA. Jessica.Langbaum@bannerhealth.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3848-1324
Noel N EllisonPentara Corporation, 2261 E. 3300 S. Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Angelika CaputoNovartis Pharma AG, Forum 1, Novartis Campus, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Ronald G ThomasUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Carolyn LangloisBanner Alzheimer's Institute, 901 E. Willetta Street, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Marie-Emmanuelle RiviereNovartis Pharma AG, Forum 1, Novartis Campus, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Ana GrafNovartis Pharma AG, Forum 1, Novartis Campus, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Cristina Lopez LopezNovartis Pharma AG, Forum 1, Novartis Campus, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Eric M ReimanBanner Alzheimer's Institute, 901 E. Willetta Street, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Pierre N TariotBanner Alzheimer's Institute, 901 E. Willetta Street, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Suzanne B HendrixPentara Corporation, 2261 E. 3300 S. Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Alzheimer's Association · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHTetraLogic Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative APOE4 TrialUF1AG046150 · NIA · BANNER ALZHEIMER'S INSTITUTE · PI REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL, TARIOT, PIERRE N. · 2013 to 2013
$33.3M
Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
Establishing the science behind Alzheimer's recruitment registries: opportunities for increasing diversity and accelerating enrollment into trialsR01AG063954 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI BLEAKLEY, AMY, LANGBAUM, JESSICA BROOKE · 2019 to 2023
$9.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063954NIA NIH HHS UF1 AG046150NIA NIH HHS UF1AG046150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing interest in identifying sensitive composite cognitive tests to serve as primary endpoints in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment trials. We reported previously a composite cognitive test score sensitive to tracking preclinical AD decline up to 5 years prior to clinical diagnosis. Here we expand upon and refine this work, empirically deriving a composite cognitive test score sensitive to tracking preclinical AD decline up to 11 years prior to diagnosis and suitable for use as a primary endpoint in a preclinical AD trial.

methodsThis study used a longitudinal approach to maximize sensitivity to tracking progressive cognitive decline in people who progressed to the clinical stages of AD (n = 868) compared to those who remained cognitively unimpaired during the same time period (n = 989), thereby correcting for normal aging and practice effects. Specifically, we developed the Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative Preclinical Composite Cognitive test (APCC) to measure very early longitudinal cognitive decline in older adults with preclinical AD. Data from three cohorts from Rush University were analyzed using a partial least squares (PLS) regression model to identify optimal composites within different time periods prior to diagnosis, up to 11 years prior to diagnosis. The mean-to-standard deviation ratio (MSDRs) is an indicator of sensitivity to change and was used to inform the final calculation of the composite score.

resultsThe optimal composite, the APCC, is calculated: 0.26*Symbol Digit Modalities + 2.24*MMSE Orientation to Time + 2.14*MMSE Orientation to Place + 0.53*Logical Memory Delayed Recall + 1.36* Word List-Delayed Recall + 0.68*Judgment of Line Orientation + 1.39*Raven's Progressive Matrices Matrices (subset of 9 items from A and B). The MSDR of the APCC in a population of preclinical AD individuals who eventually progress to cognitive impairment, compared to those who remained cognitively unimpaired during the same time period, was - 1.10 over 1 year.

conclusionsThe APCC is an empirically derived composite cognitive test score with high face validity that is sensitive to preclinical AD decline up to 11 years prior to diagnosis of the clinical stages of AD. The components of the APCC are supported by theoretical understanding of cognitive decline that occurs during preclinical AD. The APCC was used as a primary outcome in the API Generation Program trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedDisease ProgressionHumansMental RecallNeuropsychological TestsClinical trialsCognitionComposite cognitive endpointPreclinical Alzheimer’s disease

Identifiers

PMID32460855
PMCPMC7254761
OpenAlexW3030405483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.