Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32460820›Full record

ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2020

Reproductive options for families at risk of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: a review.

Lidiia Zhytnik, Kadri Simm, Andres Salumets, Maire Peters, Aare Märtson, Katre Maasalu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Comprehensive considerations for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of osteogenesis imperfecta].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  5. Osteogenesis imperfecta and the family: A qualitative analysis of the experiences of family and caregivers.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Exploration of the skeletal phenotype of theFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Comparing Clinical and Genetic Characteristics ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Article
  20. Current Overview of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lidiia ZhytnikClinic of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia. lidiia.zhytnik@ut.ee.ORCID 0000-0003-4682-0402
Kadri SimmInstitute of Philosophy and Semiotics, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Andres SalumetsCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Maire PetersCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Aare MärtsonClinic of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Katre MaasaluClinic of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Tartu University Hospital · EECompetence Centre on Health Technologies (Estonia) · EEEstonian University of Life Sciences · EEUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) is a rare genetic disorder involving bone fragility. OI patients typically suffer from numerous fractures, skeletal deformities, shortness of stature and hearing loss. The disorder is characterised by genetic and clinical heterogeneity. Pathogenic variants in more than 20 different genes can lead to OI, and phenotypes can range from mild to lethal forms. As a genetic disorder which undoubtedly affects quality of life, OI significantly alters the reproductive confidence of families at risk. The current review describes a selection of the latest reproductive approaches which may be suitable for prospective parents faced with a risk of OI. The aim of the review is to alleviate suffering in relation to family planning around OI, by enabling prospective parents to make informed and independent decisions. MAIN BODY: The current review provides a comprehensive overview of possible reproductive options for people with OI and for unaffected carriers of OI pathogenic genetic variants. The review considers reproductive options across all phases of family planning, including pre-pregnancy, fertilisation, pregnancy, and post-pregnancy. Special attention is given to the more modern techniques of assisted reproduction, such as preconception carrier screening, preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases and non-invasive prenatal testing. The review outlines the methodologies of the different reproductive approaches available to OI families and highlights their advantages and disadvantages. These are presented as a decision tree, which takes into account the autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive nature of the OI variants, and the OI-related risks of people without OI. The complex process of decision-making around OI reproductive options is also discussed from an ethical perspective.

conclusionThe rapid development of molecular techniques has led to the availability of a wide variety of reproductive options for prospective parents faced with a risk of OI. However, such options may raise ethical concerns in terms of methodologies, choice management and good clinical practice in reproductive care, which are yet to be fully addressed.

Indexed as

Osteogenesis ImperfectaFemaleGenetic TestingHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReproductionBone fragilityEthical decision-makingEthics of prenatal testingFamily planningOsteogenesis ImperfectaPreconception carrier screeningPreimplantation genetic testingPrenatal diagnosisReproduction

Identifiers

PMID32460820
PMCPMC7251694
OpenAlexW3032353750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.