Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32460811›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Glioma patients in outpatient care-optimization of psychosocial care in neuro-oncological patients (GLIOPT): Protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Mirjam Renovanz, Melina Hippler, Martin Voss, Jens Wehinger, Almuth F Keßler, Jens Gempt, Minou Nadji-Ohl, Carolin Weiß Lucas, Marion Rapp, Martin Misch and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Development of screening questions for doctor-patient consultation assessing the quality of life and psychosocial burden of glioma patients: an explorative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Mirjam RenovanzDepartment of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. mirjam.renovanz@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Melina HipplerDepartment of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Martin VossDr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jens WehingerDepartment of Neurology, Clinic Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Almuth F KeßlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Jens GemptDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Minou Nadji-OhlDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital (KH), Stuttgart, Germany.
Carolin Weiß LucasCenter for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.
Marion RappDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Martin MischDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan CoburgerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Marcus MehlitzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Barmherzige Brueder Trier, Trier, Germany.
Jürgen MeixensbergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Naureen KericDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Ghazaleh TabatabaiDepartment of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Maria BlettnerInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Melanie SchranzInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Susanne SingerInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEKlinikum Ludwigsburg · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEKlinikum Stuttgart · DEKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with high-grade gliomas (HGG) often suffer from high distress and require psychosocial support. However, due to neurological and neurocognitive deficits, adequate assessment of distress and support needs remains challenging in clinical practice. The objective of the present study is to investigate whether a systematic implementation of signaling questions into the routine outpatient consultation will be helpful to bridge this gap. METHODS/

designThis is a multicenter cluster randomized study with two arms. Randomization is done on a cluster level with 13 hospitals providing regular neuro-oncological outpatient services conducted by neurologists and/or neurosurgeons. The intervention will include an assessment of psychosocial distress of patients in doctor-patient conversation compared to assessment of psychosocial distress via questionnaire (control, standard of care). In total, 616 HGG patients will be enrolled. The outcome will be the number of HGG patients with increased psychosocial distress who receive professional support from psychosocial services. Secondary endpoints are inter alia number of patients reporting psychosocial distress and unmet needs detected correctly by the respective method; quality of life; psychological well-being and burden of the patients before and after doctor-patient consultation; as well as the length of the doctor-patient consultation. DISCUSSION: Patients with HGG are confronted with an oncological diagnosis and at the same time with high symptom burden. This often leads to distress, which is not always adequately recognized and treated. So far, only a limited number of adequate instruments are available to assess HGG patient's distress. Yet, an adequate care and support network might facilitate the course of the disease and tumor therapies for patients. Our hypothesis is that an assessment conducted directly by attending doctors and in which the doctors talk to patients with HGG will be more effective than an assessment via a questionnaire, leading to better identifying patients in need of support. This may lead to an improvement of health care in these patients. Further, this method might be implemented also in other brain tumor patients (e.g., patients with brain metastases).

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00018079. Registered on 3rd September 2019.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAttitude of Health PersonnelCluster AnalysisCommunicationGermanyGliomaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsPsychiatric RehabilitationQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalAssessmentDistressHigh-grade gliomaPrimary brain tumor patientsPsychosocial careSupportive care needs

Identifiers

PMID32460811
PMCPMC7251889
OpenAlexW3029463980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.