Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32460788›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and therapy2020

A prospective cohort study of outcomes for isoniazid prevention therapy: a nested study from a national QI collaborative in Uganda.

Simon Sensalire, Esther Karungi Karamagi Nkolo, Juliana Nabwire, Anna Lawino, Dithan Kiragga, Martin Muhire, Herbert Kadama, Cordelia Katureebe, Proscovia Namuwenge, Joshua Musinguzi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon SensalireUniversity Research Co., LLC, USAID RHITES N-Acholi Activity, Kampala, Uganda. ssensalire2015@gmail.com.
Esther Karungi Karamagi NkoloUniversity Research Co., LLC, USAID RHITES N-Acholi Activity, Kampala, Uganda.
Juliana NabwireUniversity Research Co., LLC, USAID RHITES N-Acholi Activity, Kampala, Uganda.
Anna LawinoUniversity Research Co., LLC, USAID RHITES N-Acholi Activity, Kampala, Uganda.
Dithan KiraggaUniversity Research Co., LLC, USAID RHITES N-Acholi Activity, Kampala, Uganda.
Martin MuhireUniversity Research Co., LLC, USAID RHITES N-Acholi Activity, Kampala, Uganda.
Herbert KadamaMinistry of Health, AIDS Control Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Cordelia KatureebeMinistry of Health, AIDS Control Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Proscovia NamuwengeMinistry of Health, AIDS Control Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Joshua MusinguziMinistry of Health, AIDS Control Program, Kampala, Uganda.
Jacqueline CalnanUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID), Kampala, Uganda.
Dejene SeyoumUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID), Kampala, Uganda.
Ministry of Health · UGUnited States Agency for International Development · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection constitute a deadly infectious disease synergy disease and major public health problem throughout the world. The risk of developing active TB in people living with HIV (PLHIV) is 21 times higher than the rest of the world population. The overlap of latent TB infection and HIV infection has resulted in marked increases in TB incidence in countries with dual epidemics. Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) is the single most significant way to reduce incident TB in PLHIV, besides early ART initiation, isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) is the key intervention to prevent TB among PLHIV. This prospective cohort and longitudinal study aimed to document; retention, adherence, development of active TB disease, possible adverse drug reactions and completion among patients initiated on IPT in Jan 2019.

methodsThis was both a prospective cohort and longitudinal study nested within a national quality improvement collaborative in which multiple quality improvement teams tested changes in care delivery to improve the delivery of IPT. The prospective cohort were HIV patients without TB disease initiated on a dosage of Isoniazid 300 mg/day for adults and 150 mg/day for children for a period of 6 months. Association statistics were used to describe patient characteristics and outcomes. Variables with p-value < 0.05 were used to determine linear by linear associations between patient characteristics assumed to influence both primary and secondary outcomes. Variables with a p-value < 0.05 were included in the logistical regression model. The final model included those factors that retained statistical significance. The odds ratios (OR) and adjusted OR (AOR) along with its 95% confidence interval were used to determine the power of relationship in determining the outcomes of interest. The model was tested for fitness using goodness-of-fit Hosmer-Lemeshow tests.

resultsThe completion of IPT was at 89%. A significant proportion of patients adhered to treatment (89%) and kept their appointment schedules-retention (89%). All patients (100%) received IPT at each appointment visit. Only 4% of patients experienced side effects of isoniazid (INH) but none of them developed active TB at the end of the 6 month INH dose. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of covariates of IPT completion revealed a strong and statistical association between IPT completion and age, gender, retention and side effects of INH. Our multivariate model found that children below 15 years were less likely to complete INH than patients ≥ 15 years (AOR = 0.416, p = 0.230, df = 1). Female patients were 2 times more likely to complete INH dose than male patients (AOR = 1.598, p = 0.018). Patients who kept all their appointment schedules were 10 times more likely to complete IPT than those who missed one or more schedules (AOR = 10.726, p = 0.000, df = 1). We also found that patients who did not report any side effects associated with INH were 2 times more likely to complete INH (AOR = 1.958, p = 0.016, df = 1) than patients who reported one or more side effects.

conclusionTreatment completion is the end-point of the IPT initiation strategy in Uganda. With a completion rate of 89%, our results seem re-assuring and suggest that improvement collaborative is an effective approach to achieving results through combined efforts. The high rates of completion are encouraging indicators of progress in the implementation of collaborative activities in the study setting. However, such collaboratives would require periodic evaluation to prevent possible relapses in progress attained.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntitubercular AgentsChildFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceIntersectoral CollaborationIsoniazidLatent TuberculosisLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioProspective StudiesAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidCollaborativeCompletionIPTQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32460788
PMCPMC7254658
OpenAlexW3032746925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.