Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32460765›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2020

Acoustic analysis and detection of pharyngeal fricative in cleft palate speech using correlation of signals in independent frequency bands and octave spectrum prominent peak.

Fei He, Xiyue Wang, Heng Yin, Han Zhang, Gang Yang, Ling He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. An Ultrasound Investigation of Tongue Dorsum Raising in Children with Cleft Palate +/- Cleft Lip.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fei HeCollege of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China.
Xiyue WangCollege of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China.
Heng YinWest China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Han ZhangCollege of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China.
Gang YangCollege of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China.
Ling HeCollege of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China. ling.he@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7168-2737

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61503264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharyngeal fricative is one typical compensatory articulation error of cleft palate speech. It passively influences daily communication for people who suffer from it. The automatic detection of pharyngeal fricatives in cleft palate speech can provide information for clinical doctors and speech-language pathologists to aid in diagnosis.

resultsThis paper proposes two features (CSIFs: correlation of signals in independent frequency bands; OSPP: octave spectrum prominent peak) to detect pharyngeal fricative speech. CSIFs feature is proposed to detect the distribution characteristics of frequency components in pharyngeal fricative speech caused by the changed place of articulation and movement of articulators. While OSPP is presented to reflect the concentration degree of prominent peak which is closely related to the place of articulation in pharyngeal fricative, both features are investigated to relate to the altered production process of pharyngeal fricative. To evaluate the capability of these two features to detect pharyngeal fricative, we collected a speech database covering all the types of initial consonants in which pharyngeal fricatives occur. In this detection task, the classifier used to discriminate pharyngeal fricative speech and normal speech is based on ensemble learning.

conclusionThe detection accuracy obtained with CSIFs and OSPP features ranges from 83.5 to 84.5% and from 85 to 87%, respectively. When these two features are combined, the detection accuracy for pharyngeal fricative speech ranges from 88 to 89%, with an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) value of 93%.

Indexed as

AcousticsPharynxPhoneticsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedCleft PalateHumansMachine LearningSpeechCleft palate speechCorrelation of independent frequency bandsEnergy regionPharyngeal fricative speechProminent peak

Identifiers

PMID32460765
PMCPMC7251748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.