Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32460703›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Extracting chemical reactions from text using Snorkel.

Emily K Mallory, Matthieu de Rochemonteix, Alex Ratner, Ambika Acharya, Chris Re, Roselie A Bright, Russ B Altman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily K MalloryBiomedical Informatics Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Matthieu de RochemonteixDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alex RatnerDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ambika AcharyaDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Chris ReDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Roselie A BrightOffice of Health Informatics, Office of the Chief Scientist, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Russ B AltmanDepartments of Medicine, Genetics, Bioengineering, and Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. russ.altman@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3859-2905

Funding

UCSF-Stanford Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and InnovationU01FD005978 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO, GIACOMINI, KATHLEEN M · 2016 to 2025
$34.5M
POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Text Mining for High-fidelity Curation and Discovery of Gene-drug-phenotype RelationshipsR01LM005652 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2000 to 2018
$6.2M
UCSF-Stanford Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and InnovationU01FD004979 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO, GIACOMINI, KATHLEEN M · 2014 to 2016
$5.4M
Undergraduate Summer Research Experiences Support for Combining systems biology and structural biology to find new therapeuticsR01GM102365 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2012 to 2021
$3.0M
Integrating literature and experimental data for druggability methodsF31LM012354 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MALLORY, EMILY KATHRYN · 2016 to 2017
$76k
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency FA86501827865Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (US) FA87501720095FDA HHS U01 FD004979FDA HHS U01 FD005978National Science Foundation CCF1563078National Science Foundation CCF1763315National Science Foundation (US) ACI-1429830National Science Foundation (US) DGE-114747NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102365NIH HHS GM102365NIH HHS LM012354NIH HHS LM05652NIH HHS N000141712266NLM NIH HHS F31 LM012354NLM NIH HHS R01 LM005652Office of Naval Research N000141712266U.S. Food and Drug Administration U01FD004979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnzymatic and chemical reactions are key for understanding biological processes in cells. Curated databases of chemical reactions exist but these databases struggle to keep up with the exponential growth of the biomedical literature. Conventional text mining pipelines provide tools to automatically extract entities and relationships from the scientific literature, and partially replace expert curation, but such machine learning frameworks often require a large amount of labeled training data and thus lack scalability for both larger document corpora and new relationship types.

resultsWe developed an application of Snorkel, a weakly supervised learning framework, for extracting chemical reaction relationships from biomedical literature abstracts. For this work, we defined a chemical reaction relationship as the transformation of chemical A to chemical B. We built and evaluated our system on small annotated sets of chemical reaction relationships from two corpora: curated bacteria-related abstracts from the MetaCyc database (MetaCyc_Corpus) and a more general set of abstracts annotated with MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) term Bacteria (Bacteria_Corpus; a superset of MetaCyc_Corpus). For the MetaCyc_Corpus, we obtained 84% precision and 41% recall (55% F1 score). Extending to the more general Bacteria_Corpus decreased precision to 62% with only a four-point drop in recall to 37% (46% F1 score). Overall, the Bacteria_Corpus contained two orders of magnitude more candidate chemical reaction relationships (nine million candidates vs 68,0000 candidates) and had a larger class imbalance (2.5% positives vs 5% positives) as compared to the MetaCyc_Corpus. In total, we extracted 6871 chemical reaction relationships from nine million candidates in the Bacteria_Corpus.

conclusionsWith this work, we built a database of chemical reaction relationships from almost 900,000 scientific abstracts without a large training set of labeled annotations. Further, we showed the generalizability of our initial application built on MetaCyc documents enriched with chemical reactions to a general set of articles related to bacteria.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiochemical PhenomenaDatabases, FactualData MiningHumansMachine LearningPublicationsSoftwareChemical reactionsCurationDatabaseSnorkelText mining

Identifiers

PMID32460703
PMCPMC7251675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.