Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32460665›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Infant vaccination education preferences among low-income pregnant women.

Erika L Fuchs, Jacqueline M Hirth, Fangjian Guo, V Gnaukita Brown, Leslie Cofie, Abbey B Berenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Maternal Vaccination and Vaccine Hesitancy.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erika L FuchsCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5243-8464
Jacqueline M HirthCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston, TX, USA.
Fangjian GuoCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston, TX, USA.
V Gnaukita BrownCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston, TX, USA.
Leslie CofieCollege of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University , Greenville, NC, USA.
Abbey B BerensonCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston, TX, USA.

Funding

UTMB WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH SCHOLARS PROGRAMK12HD052023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI BERENSON, ABBEY B · 2005 to 2023
$8.1M
Interdisciplinary Women's Reproductive Health Fellowship (RHF)T32HD055163 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BERENSON, ABBEY B · 2008 to 2017
$1.7M
Genetic testing in young women for cancer preventionK07CA222343 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GUO, FANGJIAN · 2018 to 2022
$632k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA222343NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052023NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD055163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood vaccination is an important public health intervention, yet many children remain under-vaccinated. The objective of this study was to examine infant vaccination education preferences in a population of low-income pregnant women by ethnicity, nativity, and language. Pregnant women 14-44 y old (n = 335) attending a participating low-income reproductive health clinic in southeast Texas from May 26-July 21, 2017, and who completed a paper survey offered in English and Spanish were included. Participants were asked to complete questions about their demographic characteristics and preferences about infant vaccination education. To examine differences in vaccine education preferences by participant demographic characteristics, chi-squared tests, or Fisher's exact tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted using Stata SE Version 15.1 with α = 0.05. Nearly half (47.5%) of participants considered pregnancy the best time to get information about infant vaccination and were most likely (40.6%) to indicate the nurse who gives vaccines during pregnancy as the health-care worker with whom they would like to discuss infant vaccination. There were no demographic differences in preferred timing of vaccine education delivery or provider who delivers vaccine education. Prenatal, nurse-delivered vaccine educational programs would be well accepted in this low-income population.

Indexed as

Influenza VaccinesPregnant PeopleChildFemaleHealth EducationHumansInfantPovertyPregnancyTexasVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesnursesobstetricspediatricsVaccinationvaccine education

Identifiers

PMID32460665
PMCPMC7872064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.