ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020
Pulsed focused ultrasound lowers interstitial fluid pressure and increases nanoparticle delivery and penetration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenograft tumors.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in ultrasound-mediated nanozyme systems in therapeutic applications.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Review
- Cancer-associated fibroblasts as a target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: bridging mechanisms to therapy with drugs, adjuvants, and nanotechnology.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-Enhanced Drug Delivery in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: A New Therapeutic Strategy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Regulation of the brain tumor microenvironment by focused ultrasound.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2025Review
- The effect of temperature constraints on the treatment of tumors using focused ultrasound-induced acoustic streaming.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mechanical signatures in cancer metastasis.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025Review
- Mechanobiology of 3D cell confinement and extracellular crowding.Biophysical reviews · 2024Review
- Ultrasound Combination to Improve the Efficacy of Current Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Sonodynamic and sonomechanical effect on cellular stemness and extracellular physicochemical environment to potentiate chemotherapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Fundamentals and Applications of Focused Ultrasound-Assisted Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Solid Tumors.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Extracellular matrix re-normalization to improve cold tumor penetration by oncolytic viruses.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Nanoparticle Dynamics in Composite Hydrogels Exposed to Low-Frequency Focused Ultrasound.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multifunctional nanostructures: Intelligent design to overcome biological barriers.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Challenges and Opportunities Associated With Drug Delivery for the Treatment of Solid Tumors.Oncology reviews · 2023Review
- Pulsed Focal Ultrasound as a Non-Invasive Method to Deliver Exosomes in the Brain/Stroke.Journal of biomedical nanotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nanocarriers offer a promising approach to significantly improve therapeutic delivery to solid tumors as well as limit the side effects associated with anti-cancer agents. However, their relatively large size can negatively affect their ability to efficiently penetrate into more interior tumor regions, ultimately reducing therapeutic efficacy. Poor penetration of large agents such as nanocarriers is attributed to factors in the tumor microenvironment such as elevated interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and fibrillar collagen in the extracellular matrix. Our previous studies reported that pretreatment of solid tumor xenografts with nondestructive pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) can improve the delivery and subsequent therapy of a variety of therapeutic formulations in different tumor models, where the results were associated with expanded extracellular spaces (ECS), an increase in hydraulic conductivity, and decrease in tissue stiffness. Here, we demonstrate the inverse relationship between IFP and the penetration of systemically administered nanoparticle (NP) probes, where IFP increased from the tumor periphery to their center. Furthermore, we show that pretreatment with pFUS can safely reduce IFP and improve NP delivery; especially into the center of the tumors. These results coincide with effects generated in the fibrillar collagen network microstructure in the ECS as determined by quantitative polarized light microscopy. Whole tumor and histomorphometric analysis, however, did not show significant differences in collagen area fraction or collagen feature solidity, as well as tumor cross-sectional area and aspect ratio, as a result of the treatments. We present a biophysical model connecting the experimental results, where pFUS-mediated cytoarchitectural changes are associated with improved redistribution of the interstitial fluid and lower IFP. The resulting improvement in NP delivery supports our previous therapeutic studies and may have implications for clinical applications to improve therapeutic outcomes in cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.