Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32459991›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2020

Impacts of Sleep Loss versus Waking Experience on Brain Plasticity: Parallel or Orthogonal?

Robbert Havekes, Sara J Aton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robbert HavekesNeurobiology Expertise Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: r.havekes@rug.nl.
Sara J AtonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, College of Literature, Sciences, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: saton@umich.edu.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Thalamocortical and corticocortical mechanisms for sleep-dependent visual learningR01NS104776 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATON, SARA J · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies on the effects of sleep deprivation on synaptic plasticity have yielded discrepant results. Sleep deprivation studies using novelty exposure as a means to keep animals awake suggests that sleep (compared with wake) leads to widespread reductions in net synaptic strength. By contrast, sleep deprivation studies using approaches avoiding novelty-induced arousal (i.e., gentle handling) suggest that sleep can promote synaptic growth and strengthening. How can these discrepant findings be reconciled? Here, we discuss how varying methodologies for the experimental disruption of sleep (with differential introduction of novel experiences) could fundamentally alter the experimental outcome with regard to synaptic plasticity. Thus, data from experiments aimed at assessing the relative impact of sleep versus wake on the brain may instead reflect the quality of the waking experience itself. The highlighted work suggests that brain plasticity resulting from novel experiences versus wake per se has unique and distinct features.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticitySleepAnimalsBrainFemaleMaleMiceRatsSleep DeprivationWakefulnessconsolidationhippocampusneocortexsleep deprivationsynaptic and structural plasticitysynaptic homeostasis hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID32459991
PMCPMC7505037
OpenAlexW3016819467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.